Elsevier

Journal of Clinical Lipidology

Volume 12, Issue 2, March–April 2018, Pages 292-299.e3
Journal of Clinical Lipidology

Review Article
Clinical and pathophysiological evidence supporting the safety of extremely low LDL levels—The zero-LDL hypothesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2017.12.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Many patients on proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors achieve extremely low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels.

  • Extremely low LDL-C levels are associated with even less cardiovascular risk.

  • Extremely low LDL-C concentrations cause no clinically relevant side effects.

  • Low LDL-C levels due to higher clearance are a marker of adequate LDL–LDLreceptor function.

Abstract

While the impact of very low concentrations of low–density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on cardiovascular prevention is very reassuring, it is intriguing to know what effect these extremely low LDL-C concentrations have on lipid homoeostasis. The evidence supporting the safety of extremely low LDL levels comes from genetic studies and clinical drug trials. Individuals with lifelong low LDL levels due to mutations in genes associated with increased LDL-LDL receptor (LDLR) activity reveal no safety issues. Patients achieving extremely low LDL levels in the IMPROVE-IT and FOURIER, and the PROFICIO and ODYSSEY programs seem not to have an increased prevalence of adverse effects. The main concern regarding extremely low LDL-C plasma concentrations is the adequacy of the supply of cholesterol, and other molecules, to peripheral tissues. However, LDL proteomic and kinetic studies reaffirm that LDL is the final product of endogenous lipoprotein metabolism. Four of 5 LDL particles are cleared through the LDL-LDLR pathway in the liver. Given that mammalian cells have no enzymatic systems to degrade cholesterol, the LDL-LDLR pathway is the main mechanism for removal of cholesterol from the body. Our focus, therefore, is to review, from a physiological perspective, why such extremely low LDL-C concentrations do not appear to be detrimental. We suggest that extremely low LDL-C levels due to increased LDLR activity may be a surrogate of adequate LDL-LDLR pathway function.

Introduction

The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have changed the paradigm for lipid-lowering therapy to prevent cardiovascular disease. Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk (FOURIER), the first completed outcome study with a PCSK9 inhibitor, showed the clinical benefit of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) below the current goal, extending the data obtained by the IMPROVE-IT study. In the FOURIER trial, 42% of patients achieved LDL-C levels <0.65 mmol/L (25 mg/dL).1 While the impact of very low LDL-C concentration on cardiovascular prevention is very reassuring, it is intriguing to know what effect these extremely low LDL-C concentrations have on lipid homoeostasis.

Our focus, therefore, is to review, from a physiological perspective, why such extremely low LDL-C concentrations do not appear to be detrimental. We suggest that as the LDL-LDL receptor (LDLR) pathway is the main mechanism for removal of circulating cholesterol from the body, extremely low LDL-C levels due to increased LDLR activity may be a surrogate of LDL-LDLR pathway optimization. (Complete references list in online supplementary material)

Section snippets

Setting the stage: Evidence from trials

The direct correlation between LDL-C levels and cardiovascular events shown by epidemiological studies is indisputable.2 Added to this, there is a wealth of data from randomized controlled trials with statin therapy showing that lowering LDL-C levels drives cardiovascular risk reduction3 underpinning “the lower is better” concept.4 The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration showed a 22% relative risk reduction per unit LDL-C mmol/L reduction with statin therapy.5 IMPROVE-IT (Examining

What is an LDL particle?

Before discussing this question, a background on LDL physiology is appropriate. LDL particles comprised lipid (∼80%, predominantly cholesterol as cholesteryl ester) and protein. The triglyceride content of LDL is relatively low under normal conditions (5%–10%) but increases with diabetes or obesity (Fig. 3A).

LDL transports cholesterol in the blood and extracellular fluids, and this is largely controlled by the interactions of surface proteins with lipid transport proteins, enzymes, and cell

Transporting liposoluble vitamins

Among the liposoluble vitamins, only vitamin E (α-tocopherol) is strongly associated with LDL metabolism. Vitamin E is absorbed via chylomicrons, and also HDL, in enterocytes and its transport in the blood largely follows that of cholesterol within lipoprotein metabolism, with subsequent transport into the liver by chylomicron remnants through LRP1, and VLDL and LDL by the LDLR pathway.42 One of the main physiological roles of vitamin E is linked to LDL protection because of its antioxidant

Lessons from homozygous FH

The main concern about very low LDL-C plasma concentrations is that cholesterol and other molecules transported by LDL will not be properly supplied to peripheral organs and tissues. Homozygous FH (HoFH), which is characterized by absent or defective LDLR function, provides an opportunity to evaluate the impact of the lack of LDLR-mediated peripheral delivery of cholesterol and other molecules associated with LDL.

Systematic studies of liposoluble vitamin or steroid hormone synthesis in HoFH

Conclusion

In conclusion, the clinical and physiological evidence makes the case that extremely low LDL-C plasma concentrations mediated by increased LDLR activity are not associated with significant adverse effects, within the limitations of the available clinical trial data. Given that the main function of LDL metabolism is cholesterol excretion, therapies that increase LDLR activity could provide optimization of this physiological role. In other words, extremely low LDL-C concentrations due to

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jane Stock for helping us in the article editing.

Authors' contributions: All authors have contributed to the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all have approved the final version of the article.

References (51)

  • J.J. Albers et al.

    Role of plasma phospholipid transfer protein in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (2012)
  • M. Hoekstra

    SR-BI as target in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease - A comprehensive appraisal of the cellular functions of SR-BI in physiology and disease

    Atherosclerosis

    (2017)
  • S. Tonstad et al.

    Fat-soluble vitamin levels in familial hypercholesterolemia

    J Pediatr

    (1997)
  • M. Blaha et al.

    Pregnancy in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia - Importance of LDL-apheresis

    Atheroscler Suppl

    (2015)
  • M.S. Sabatine et al.

    Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease

    N Engl J Med

    (2017)
  • W.B. Kannel et al.

    Risk factors in coronary heart disease: an evaluation of several serum lipids as predictors of coronary heart disease: the Framingham Study

    Ann Intern Med

    (1964)
  • Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

    Lancet

    (1994)
  • J.C. LaRosa et al.

    Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • C.P. Cannon et al.

    Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes

    N Engl J Med

    (2015)
  • S.E. Nissen et al.

    Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • S.J. Nicholls et al.

    Effect of evolocumab on progression of coronary disease in statin-treated patients: the GLAGOV randomized clinical trial

    JAMA

    (2016)
  • M.G. Silverman et al.

    Association between lowering LDL-C and cardiovascular risk reduction among different therapeutic interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    JAMA

    (2016)
  • B.A. Ference et al.

    Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel

    Eur Heart J

    (2017)
  • D.A. Raichlen et al.

    Physical activity patterns and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease risk in hunter-gatherers

    Am J Hum Biol

    (2016)
  • V. Sorrentino et al.

    Identification of a loss-of-function inducible degrader of the low-density lipoprotein receptor variant in individuals with low circulating low-density lipoprotein

    Eur Heart J

    (2013)
  • Cited by (45)

    • LDL as a therapeutic target

      2022, Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text