Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 147, September 2020, Pages 214-220
Lung Cancer

Retrospective study of the incidence and outcomes from lung cancer in solid organ transplant recipients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.07.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Survival of organ transplant recipients with lung cancer is reduced compared to historical norms in non-transplant patients.

  • Those treated with definitive therapy instage III and chemotherapy in stage IV NSCLC had survivals matching historic norms.

  • Adverse events from chemotherapy appear higher in transplant recipients and appear lessened with dose reductions.

  • Treated SCLC patients had survivals slightly lower than historic norms.

Abstract

Objective

Organ transplant recipients (OTR) have an increased risk of developing post-transplant malignancies with lung cancer being one of the most common. In this retrospective study, we investigated incidence, use of systemic therapy and outcomes from lung cancer in OTR.

Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with lung cancer following a solid organ transplant at the University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CA, from January 1, 1980 to June 30, 2016 were included. Data for the study population, patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes were abstracted from solid OTR databases, our cancer registry and patient charts. Univariate Kaplan-Meier curves estimated median overall survival (OS) by histology, stage and systemic therapy.

Results

Amongst 7944 OTR (heart [N = 765], lung [n = 1668], liver [n = 2238], kidney [n = 3273]), 101 (1.3 %) developed lung cancer which were included in our analyses. Of these, 81 % were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 11 % small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 8% neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Median OS (months) was 25 in those that presented with Stage I/II NSCLC (44 %); 25 for Stage III NSCLC (7%); 3 for Stage IV NCLC (31 %); 10 for Limited stage SCLC (6%); 2 for Extensive stage (ES) SCLC (5%). NSCLC patients that received palliative chemotherapy had an OS of 8 months; ES-SCLC patients that received chemotherapy had an OS of 6 months. Of all patients who received platinum doublets (n = 16), 10 (62.5 %) required dose reductions at some point. Five patients experienced febrile neutropenia (31 %); two (12 %) had other toxicities leading to discontinuation.

Conclusion

Patients with stage I/II NSCLC and NET had poorer survival compared to historical norms in non-transplant patients. Patients who had stage III NSCLC or received palliative systemic therapy had survivals at or slightly below historic norms, although numbers were small. Chemotherapy can be administered in selected OTR patients though dose reductions and febrile neutropenia were common.

Introduction

Solid organ transplant recipients (OTR) have an increased incidence of developing a malignancy post-transplant, which is the 2nd leading cause of mortality in transplant patients [1,2]. The increased risk is thought to be largely due to immunosuppression in transplant patients, allowing more cancers to escape immune surveillance, similar to other immunosuppressed populations (e.g. patients with HIV) [3]. Other theories include local immune reactions against the transplanted organ, carcinogenicity of immunosuppressants, increased surveillance, and risk from the underlying conditions that led to the need for an organ transplant [[4], [5], [6], [7]] Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies seen in OTR’s after hematological and skin cancers. However, there is a paucity of studies evaluating treatment and outcomes from lung cancer in patients with an organ transplant [1,2].

The University Health Network (UHN) has one of the largest transplant centres in North America. In this retrospective study, we investigated the incidence, treatment and survival outcomes of patients with post-transplant lung cancers in UHN from 1980 to 2016.

Section snippets

Study population

This was a retrospective study, which included all patients who received a solid organ (heart, liver, lung or kidney) transplant at the University Health Network, Toronto, CA from January 1, 1980 to June 30, 2016 and diagnosed with a post-transplant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or lung neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (Fig. 1). Patients with insufficient available data critical for our analyses, due to follow up at another institution, were excluded from the

Results

Of the 7944 patients who underwent a solid organ transplant, 123 patients (1.5 %) were diagnosed with a primary lung malignancy of which 101 (1.3 %) were included in our analysis (Fig. 1). Patient baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. The median time from transplant to cancer diagnosis was 60 months (excluding those diagnosed in the removed/explanted lung. The majority of the lung cancers were NSCLC (82 cases); with 11 cases of SCLC and 8 cases of NETs (typical carcinoid).

Discussion

This retrospective, single institution study evaluated the outcome and treatments administered in a cohort of 101 patients diagnosed with lung cancer after a solid organ transplant. Overall outcomes were poor for patients with stage I-II NSCLC, having a median OS of 25 months and for patients with stage IV disease, 3 months. Patients with SCLC similarly had a poorer OS. Systemic therapy was administered to a minority of patients, however some patients included in this analysis were treated

Conclusions

In patients diagnosed with lung cancer after a prior organ transplant, we found shorter survival in general compared to historical norms for patients with particularly early stage NSCLC despite surgical resection or radiation. Patients with stage III disease, and in the selected patients that received palliative chemotherapy for NSCLC and SCLC, outcomes were similar (for stage III), or on the lower range of what may be expected at the time for non-OTR patients, however, only a minority of NSCLC

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Kelvin Young: Conceptualization, Visualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Haiyan Jiang: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Max Marquez: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Jonathan Yeung: Writing - review & editing. Frances A. Shepherd: Writing - review & editing. Eberhard Renner: Writing - review & editing. Shaf Keshavjee: Writing - review & editing. Joseph Kim: Writing - review & editing. Heather Ross: Writing - review &

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

References (33)

  • B. Krynitz et al.

    Risk of skin cancer and other malignancies in kidney, liver, heart and lung transplant recipients 1970 to 2008—a Swedish population-based study

    Int. J. Cancer

    (2013)
  • Tracy Hampton

    Skin Cancer’s ranks rise

    JAMA

    (2005)
  • C. Vajdic et al.

    Cancer incidence before and after kidney transplantation

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • M. Hojo et al.

    Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism

    Nature

    (1999)
  • Ya-Ping Xu et al.

    Is there a survival benefit in patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung Cancer Receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy prior to surgical resection

    Medicine

    (2015)
  • K. Hotta et al.

    Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing cisplatin to carboplatin in patients with advanced non–Small-Cell lung Cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (3)

    View full text