Immunogenicity and safety of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine with a toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant (HBsAg-1018) compared with a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease☆,☆☆
Introduction
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major global public health problem especially for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients receiving hemodialysis. CKD patients are at increased risk of exposure to HBV in the hemodialysis setting because of the high prevalence of HBV, a treatment procedure with high-volume blood access, and transmission risk from the reuse of equipment and supplies for multiple patients. When infected, patients with CKD have a high risk of developing chronic hepatitis B infection and the sequelae of chronic active hepatitis including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [1].
Vaccination is an important tool in preventing the transmission of HBV [2], [3]. Currently licensed HBV vaccines containing recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (rHBsAg) adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide (alum) achieve seroprotection (antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBs] ≥ 10 mIU/mL) in greater than 90% of the healthy adult population after 3 doses over a 6-month period. While vaccination has proven effective in healthy adults, seroprotection rates (SPRs: proportion of participants with anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL) are reduced in several subgroups including persons with CKD, diabetes mellitus, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection [4], [5], [6], [7], [8].
Patients with chronic renal failure have defects in both humoral and cellular immunity, which lead to reduced responses to vaccination [7], [9]. The vaccine regimens for CKD currently recommended in the United States and Europe result in SPRs of 33–92% with most below 70% [9], [10]. Some studies have demonstrated higher response rates in CKD patients prior to becoming dialysis dependent [1], [11] and, therefore, CKD patients are often vaccinated in advance of initiating hemodialysis [1].
Patients with CKD depend on the persistence of antibodies against HBsAg for long-term protection against HBV infection because of their impaired anamnestic responses to the antigen [12]. An anti-HBs level ≥ 10 mIU/mL has been shown to correlate with protection against HBV infection [13] and, in patients with CKD, long-term maintenance of such a level is necessary since breakthrough infections may occur in persons with levels < 10 mIU/mL [14], [15], [16]. The duration of protection against HBV infection depends on the peak post-vaccination antibody level [17], [18]. Some authors have proposed that a level ≥ 100 mIU/mL is desirable in CKD patients because the duration of seroprotection is longer for them than for patients with a level of 10–99 mIU/mL [19], [20], [21]. In fact, the Standing Committee on Vaccination in Germany has recently recommended that all patients on hemodialysis receive a booster injection of hepatitis B vaccine when their anti-HBs concentration decreases below 100 mIU/mL [22].
An investigational hepatitis B vaccine, HBsAg-1018, (HEPLISAV™, Dynavax Technologies, Berkeley, California) contains 20 mcg of rHBsAg and a 22-mer synthetic phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide, 1018 adjuvant, a class B oligonucleotide. 1018, like bacterial and viral DNA, is thought to have the following effects: (1) activation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) through the pattern recognition receptor Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9); (2) conversion of pDCs into activated dendritic cells that present the processed HBsAg component of the vaccine to CD4+ T-cells; and (3) promotion of Th1 T-cell differentiation through the production of interferon alpha and interleukin-12. This activation results in a high and sustained antibody response.
Results of a phase 3 trial in generally healthy adults demonstrated two doses of HBsAg-1018 met the primary endpoint of noninferiority and superiority to three doses HBsAg-Eng (Engerix-B®, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) and induced a superior peak SPR than HBsAg-Eng with a similar safety profile [23]. Here we present data on a phase 3 trial comparing the immunogenicity and safety of three doses of HBsAg-1018 with four double doses of HBsAg-Eng in patients with CKD.
Section snippets
Study design and participants
This trial was conducted at 58 sites (46 in the US, 3 in Canada, and 9 in Germany), was approved by the appropriate institutional review boards in each country, and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practices. Written informed consent was obtained in the subject's native language prior to enrollment.
Patients 18–75 years of age with CKD defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR, modification of diet in renal disease [MDRD] formula) ≤ 45
Study participants
In this trial, 521 participants were randomized; 516 participants received a study injection (Fig. 1). In both the HBsAg-1018 and HBsAg-Eng groups, 83.3% of participants completed the trial. The most frequent reasons for discontinuation from the trial were consent withdrawn and protocol-directed discontinuation of participants on hemodialysis due to lack of seroprotection after their final injection of vaccine so they could receive additional vaccine in accordance with standard clinical
Discussion
CKD patients on hemodialysis are at risk for HBV infection because of possible exposure to HBV in the dialysis setting. Their risk for HBV infection can be reduced through vaccination [2], [3] but patients with CKD have immunologic defects that reduce their response to hepatitis B vaccine [7], requiring higher doses of currently licensed vaccines.
In this trial, three single doses of HBsAg-1018 using a total of 60 mcg of rHBsAg met the criteria for both noninferiority and superiority of
Conflict of interest statement
Robert Janssen, Hamid Namini, Sophia Rahman, Sean Bennett, William Heyward, and Tyler Martin were employees of Dynavax Technologies when the trial was conducted. Roberto Mangoo-Karim was a shareholder in the company at the time of the trial. The other authors did not report any conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the participants for their participation in this study and the staff and principal investigators for conducting the study: Duane Wombolt, MD, FACP, CPI, Clinical Research Associates of Tidewater, Norfolk, VA, Anjali Acharya, MD, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, Joseph J. C. Lee, MD, Apex Research of Riverside, Riverside, CA, George Canas, MD, Twin Cities Clinical Research, Brooklyn Center, MN, Robert Cockrell, MD, Novellus Research Sites, Inc, Fountain Valley, CA,
References (27)
- et al.
Protective effect of hepatitis B vaccine in chronic hemodialysis patients
Am J Kidney Dis
(1999) - et al.
Over a decade of experience with a yeast recombinant hepatitis B vaccine
Vaccine
(1999) - et al.
Stage of chronic kidney disease predicts seroconversion after hepatitis B immunization: earlier is better
Am J Kidney Dis
(2003) - et al.
Hepatitis B vaccination in predialysis chronic renal failure patients a comparison of two vaccination schedules
Vaccine
(2005) - et al.
Clinical evaluation of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine
Lancet
(1984) - et al.
Long-term persistence of anti-HBs after vaccination against HBV: an 18 year experience in health care workers
Vaccine
(2004) - et al.
Immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine among hemodialysis patients: effect of revaccination of non-responders and duration of protection
Vaccine
(2011) - et al.
Factors influencing response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in hemodialysis patients
Transplant Proc
(2000 May) - et al.
Immunogenicity and safety of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine with a toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant (HBsAg-1018) compared to a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in healthy adults 40–70 years of age
Vaccine
(2013) Recommendations for preventing transmission of infections among chronic hemodialysis patients
MMWR Recomm Rep
(2001)
Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B): a review of its immunogenicity and protective efficacy against hepatitis B
Drugs
Hepatitis B vaccination in diabetic patients. Randomized trial comparing recombinant vaccines containing and not containing pre-S2 antigen
Diabetes Care
Cited by (0)
- ☆
This study was funded by Dynavax Technologies Corporation.
- ☆☆
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00985426.