Original investigation
Protein catabolic rate over lean body mass ratio: A more rational approach to normalize the protein catabolic rate in dialysis patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6386(97)90492-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Protein catabolic rate (PCR), equivalent to dietary protein intake in “stable” dialysis patients, is widely accepted as a marker of their protein nutritional status. PCR is usually established from urea generation rate using urea kinetic modeling (UKM), but the normalizing factor is still a matter of controversy. By convention, PCR is expressed in grams of protein degraded daily divided by the dry body weight (BW) (nPCRBW). To be valid, this implies that dry BW is close to ideal BW and that body composition is preserved with a lean body mass (LBM) over BW ratio near 0.73. Such conditions being infrequently found in dialysis patients, it has been proposed to normalize PCR to ideal BW or to total body water, but these correction factors are not really appropriate. A more rational approach would be to express PCR as the ratio of protein degraded to the kilograms of LBM (nPCRLBM), thus offering the main advantage of directly coupling PCR to changes in protein or nitrogen reserve. In this study, we developed a combined kinetic model of urea and creatinine applied to the midweek dialysis cycle in 66 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. UKM provided Kt/V and PCR, whereas creatinine kinetic modeling (CKM) was used to calculate LBM. Thirty-four patients with a preserved LBM (LBM/dry BW ratio equal to or greater than 0.70; mean ratio, 0.81 ± 0.11) and with a dry/ideal BW ratio of 1.01 ± 0.16 had a mean PCR of 1.14 ± 0.30 g/kg/24 h when normalized to BW (nPCRBW) and of 1.40 ± 0.30 g/kg/24 h when normalized to LBM (nPCRLBM). In the 32 patients with a reduced LBM (LBM/dry BW ratio, below 0.70; mean ratio, 0.60 ± 0.09) and dry/ideal BW ratio of 1.11 ± 0.23, the mean nPCRBW was 0.99 ± 0.31 g/kg/24 h, whereas nPCRLBM was 1.62 ± 0.32 g/kg/24 h. For both subgroups, Kt/V was similar, with mean values of 1.76 ± 0.34 and 1.69 ± 0.27. Normalizing PCR to LBM offers a double benefit: it compensates for the error induced by abnormal body composition (eg, obese patients) and permits PCR to be adjusted for the decrease in LBM that occurs with age. We propose nPCRLBM as a more rational index to express PCR in dialysis patients.

References (27)

  • EG Lowrie et al.

    Commonly measured laboratory variables in hemodialysis patients: Relationship among them and to death risk

    Semin Nephrol

    (1992)
  • A Stein et al.

    The correlation between Kt/V and protein catabolic rate: A self-fulfilling prophecy

    Nephrol Dial Transpl

    (1994)
  • DE Uehlinger

    Another look at the relationship between protein intake and dialysis dose

    J Am Soc Nephrol

    (1996)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Nutritional management of maintenance hemodialysis patients

      2021, Nutritional Management of Renal Disease, Fourth Edition
    • Hemodialysis Centers Guide 2020

      2021, Nefrologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, nPCR may be underestimated due to the influence of the permeability of the dialyzer, the amount of blood, dialysate flow, and the distribution of urea in obese, malnourished or edematous patients. In contrast, nPCR may be overestimated by the posterior urea rebound following dialysis333–335. In hemodialysis units there are patients who in addition to renal failure suffer other concomitant disease conditions requiring follow-up and special monitoring.

    • Higher convection volume exchange with online hemodiafiltration is associated with survival advantage for dialysis patients: The effect of adjustment for body size

      2016, Kidney International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dialysis patients are relatively sedentary, and greater muscle mass generally associates with greater physical activity and, as such, increased protein break down and metabolic rate.31 Re-analysis of the HD study showed that patients with greater body surface area, and by analogy muscle mass,32 benefited from a greater dose of dialysis when their dialysis prescription was adjusted for body surface area.24,33 This would support our analysis that the associated survival advantage for higher convective doses are observed when the convective dose is adjusted according to body surface area or total body water, surrogate estimates of lean body mass, rather than body size estimates more related to fat mass.34

    • The Saga of Two Centuries of Urea: Nontoxic Toxin or Vice Versa?

      2014, Seminars in Nephrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These observations lead to the establishment of directly applicable formulas to estimate PNA from UNA in dialyzed patients, but these values are accurate only in the steady-state patient in whom there is no positive or negative N accumulation.43 The rate of protein metabolism is associated with body size, so that comparability across patients is possible only after normalization for body weight which depends on the chosen measure (eg, lean body mass, total body water mass, dry body weight).44 Normalizing actual body weight can be misleading in malnourished, obese, or edematous patients, in whom using edema-free body weight therefore is preferred.42

    • Prealbumin is associated with visceral fat mass in patients receiving hemodialysis

      2013, Journal of Renal Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      All measurements were made in duplicate using the average of these values for calculations. We used normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) (grams per kilogram per day) calculated from dialysis kinetic modeling during the month that body composition was measured as a valid surrogate for dietary protein intake23 and separately analyzed the determinants of albumin and then of prealbumin by multiple stepwise regression. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and were compared with the Student t test or analysis of variance when appropriate.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text