Journal Information
Vol. 44. Issue. 4.July - August 2024
Pages 459-614
Visits
560
Vol. 44. Issue. 4.July - August 2024
Pages 459-614
Original article
Full text access
Pilot monitoring study in patients with diabetic kidney disease using NORA application
Estudio piloto de seguimiento en pacientes con enfermedad renal diabética mediante la aplicación NORA
Visits
560
Néstor Toapantaa, Ester Sánchez-Gavilana, Cristina Guiraoa, Juan Leon Romána, Natalia Ramosa, Ander Vergaraa, María Azancota, Irene Agraza, Sheila Bermejoa, Estefanía Montielb, Carlos Molinab, Marc Ribób, María José Solera,
Corresponding author
mjsoler01@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
a Serivicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
b Serivicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (4)
Show moreShow less
Tables (2)
Table 1. Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics.
Table 2. Analytical variables at 90 days of follow-up.
Show moreShow less
Additional material (1)
Abstract
Introduction

Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) is the most common cause of end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD), conditioning these patients to a worse renal prognosis and higher cardiovascular mortality and/or requirement for renal replacement therapy. The use of novel information and communication technologies (ICTs) focused on the field of health, may facilitates a better quality of life and disease control in these patients. Our objective is to evaluate the effect of monitoring DKD patients using NORA-app.

Material and methods

Prospective feasibility/validation study of NORA-app in patients with DKD stage G3bA3 or higher, followed in outpatient clinics of a tertiary care hospital. NORA-app is an application for smartphones designed to control risk factors, share educational medical information, communicate via chat with health professionals, increase treatment compliance (Morisky-Green), and collect patient reported outcomes such as anxiety and depression using HADs scale. Clinical-laboratory variables were collected at 3 months and compared to control patients who declined using NORA-app.

Results

From 01/01/2021 to 03/03/2022 the use of NORA-app was offered to 118 patients, 82 accepted and 36 declined (controls). After a mean follow-up period of 6,04 months and at the time of data extraction 71 (86.6%) NORA-app patients remain active users, 2 have completed the follow-up at one year and 9 are inactive (3 due to death and 6 due to non-locatable). There were no differences in baseline characteristics including Creatinine [2.1 (1.6−2.4) vs. 1.9 (1.5−2.5)] mg/dL and alb/creat [962 (475–1784) vs. 1036 (560–2183)] mg/gr between Nora and control patients respectively. The therapeutic compliance rate in the NORA-app group was 77%, improving at 90 days to 91%. Patients in the NORA-group showed significantly lower levels of alb/creat than controls (768(411–1971) mg/g Vs 2039 (974–3214) p = 0.047) at 90-day follow-up.

Conclusions

In patients with DKD the use of NORA-app was maintained in the long-term, leading to high levels of treatment compliance, and achieving a better disease control. Our study suggests that the generalized use of ICTs may help in the personalized monitoring of these patients to delay the progression of kidney disease.

Keywords:
Chronic kidney disease
Diabetic kidney disease
Kidney disease progression
Alb/creat
Telemedicine
Smartphone app
Telehealth
Resumen
Introducción

La Enfermedad Renal Diabética (ERD) es la causa más común de enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) terminal, condicionando a estos pacientes a un peor pronóstico renal y mayor mortalidad cardiovascular y/o requerimiento de terapia renal sustitutiva. El uso de novedosas tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) enfocadas al ámbito de la salud, puede facilitar una mejor calidad de vida y control de la enfermedad en estos pacientes. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar el efecto de monitorización de pacientes con ERD utilizando la aplicación NORA (NORA-app).

Materiales y métodos

Estudio prospectivo de viabilidad/validación de la aplicación NORA-app en pacientes con ERD en estadio G3bA3 o superior, seguidos en consultas externas de un hospital de atención terciaria. NORA-app es una aplicación para teléfonos inteligentes diseñada para controlar los factores de riesgo, compartir información médica educativa, comunicarse vía chat con profesionales de la salud, aumentar el cumplimiento del tratamiento (Morisky-Green) así como evaluación de ansiedad y depresión utilizando la escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión (HAD). Las variables clínico-analíticas se recogieron al inicio y a los 3 meses, comparándose con los pacientes que desistieron del uso de NORA-app (grupo control).

Resultados

Desde el 01/01/2021 al 03/03/2022 se ofreció el uso de NORA-app a 118 pacientes, 82 aceptaron y 36 rechazaron (controles). Después de un período medio de seguimiento de 6,04 meses, 71 (86,6 %) pacientes de NORA-app siguen siendo usuarios activos, 2 han completado el seguimiento al año y 9 están inactivos (3 por fallecimiento y 6 por no localizables). No hubo diferencias en las características basales, incluida la creatinina [2,1 (1,6−2,4) frente a 1,9 (1,5−2,5)] mg/dL y la alb/creat [962 (475–1784) frente a 1036 (560–2183)] mg/gr entre los pacientes NORA-app y grupo control, respectivamente. La tasa de cumplimiento terapéutico en el grupo NORA-app fue del 77%, mejorando a los 90 días al 91%. Los pacientes del grupo de NORA-app mostraron niveles significativamente más bajos de alb/creat que los controles (768 (411–1971) mg/g vs. 2039 (974–3214); p = 0,047) a los 90 días de seguimiento.

Conclusiones

En pacientes con ERD que mantuvieron el uso de NORA-app a largo plazo, llevo a presentar altos niveles de cumplimiento del tratamiento, logrando un mejor control de la enfermedad. Nuestro estudio sugiere que el uso generalizado de las TIC puede ayudar en el seguimiento personalizado de estos pacientes para retrasar la progresión de la enfermedad renal.

Palabras clave:
Enfermedad renal crónica
Enfermedad renal diabética
Progresión de enfermedad renal
Alb/creat
Telemedicina
Aplicación para móvil
Telesalud
Full Text
Introduction

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing considerably worldwide,1 becoming one of the fastest growing pathologies as a cause of death.2,3 CKD is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity, premature mortality and decreased health-related quality of life.4 The main cause of CKD is diabetic kidney disease (DKD), conditioning these patients to a poorer renal prognosis and higher cardiovascular mortality.5–7 In addition, there has been a substantial increase in the number of people with end-stage CKD (stage 5) requiring renal replacement therapy such as dialysis or transplantation, so that the management of CKD currently represents a major challenge for governments and health financial costs.8

Prevention and control of cardiovascular risk factors are essential in the management of CKD. During the last few years, follow-up studies on the control of cardiovascular risk factors have been carried out according to the KDIGO5 guidelines, with the aim of modifying lifestyle and creating healthy habits to reduce the risk of progression of kidney disease. In this sense, the LOOK-AHEAD study evaluated the effect of a pattern of intensive lifestyle modification aimed at weight reduction in overweight diabetic patients, compared to patients who followed standard treatment, patients assigned to the intensive follow-up program presented greater weight reduction, better glycosylated hemoglobin records and better control of various cardiovascular risk factors, as well as a significant reduction in alb/creat, also highlighting the importance of the results achieved with active monitoring reducing the burden of vascular risk associated with diabetes and considering these key therapeutic alternatives in the management of the diabetic patient.9 In addition, the classic studies of the STENO group have shown that intensive treatment of cardiovascular risk factors (HTN, smoking, glycosylated hemoglobin, etc.) slow down the progression of chronic kidney disease.10 Currently, strategies have been developed aimed at improving therapeutic compliance and healthy lifestyle modification in chronic patients, since there is little point to design and develop new drugs aimed at improving disease control if, by contrast, there is systematic non-compliance with medical guidelines and advice.

Studies have shown an increase in the control of specific cardiovascular risk factors (obesity, diabetes, hypertension), thanks to information and communication technologies (ICT), i.e., telemedicine.11 In this regard, the Stroke Unit of Vall d'Hebron University Hospital has developed an application for smartphones called NORA-app (formerly known as Farmalarm), which allows the control of medical treatment by means of medication alarms, recording of the biometric profile (weight, height) and control of cardiovascular risk factors (recording of blood pressure, capillary glucose levels, oxygen saturation, weight and daily steps). In addition, it allows to send health education material, surveys (adherence to treatment, anxiety/depression, health status), visits calendar, generation of reports, module of frequently asked questions, bidirectional communication via chat and video call, and contact information of the Unit. NORA-app has been validated during the last five years by the Stroke Unit of the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, demonstrating an improved control of cardiovascular risk factors in patients who had suffered a stroke, increasing the degree of knowledge about the disease.12 Our objective is to adapt and evaluate the effect of monitoring in patients with DKD using NORA-app, focusing on the control of risk factors for progression of renal disease considered as composite major adverse renal event (MARE).13

Material and methods

We conducted a prospective feasibility and validation study of the NORA-app application in patients over 18 years of age with DKD stage G3bA3 or higher (eGFR CKD-EPI<45 mL/min/m2 and alb/creat >300 mg/g), followed in outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital and who have a mobile device (the participant or family member) that allows the use of applications such as WhatsApp. Patients with DKD stage G3bA2 or lower, as well as patients in stage G5 (eGFR < 15 mL/min/m2) with an expected early requirement (less than one year) of renal replacement therapy were excluded. Patients with moderate-severe cognitive impairment, psychiatric pathology, language barrier, severe sensory deficits (hypoacusis/lack of vision) and/or inability to collaborate in the study (if necessary, no social/family support) were also excluded.

Exploratory study variables include demographics, comorbidities, laboratory tests (every three months determination of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate [CKD-EPI], alb/creat, glycosylated hemoglobin, hemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin saturation index [TSI], sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone [PTH], calcidiol, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, and scales such as treatment adherence (Morisky-Green),14 signs and symptoms, depression and anxiety (HADS),15 health status (PROMIS).16 The scales for assessing patient status were sent at different periods: baseline at seven days, 90 days and one-year of follow-up.

The Morisky-Green scale evaluates adherence to pharmacological treatment by means of four items that ask about how the patient complies with the medication prescribed by the physician (Appendix 1). It is considered altered when one or more of the answers is positive, indicating poor compliance by the patient in taking the medication.14 The signs and symptoms scale refers to the presence of nausea/vomiting, edema and respiratory distress (Appendix 2). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale is composed of 14 items that are divided into two groups HAD-anxiety and HAD-depression (Annex 3). The scores obtained as absolute numbers have a range from 0 to 21, with the highest scores being considered unfavorable scores. From 0 to 7 are the limit of normality, from 7 to 10 "abnormal" and greater than 10 indicates alteration in anxiety and depression.15 The state of health is self-assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10 (PROMIS-10) scale, which assesses the general state of health based on 10 items (Appendix 4): physical health, pain, fatigue, emotional state, social relations, general perception of the state of health. The results obtained are grouped into two subgroups "physical health" and "mental health", and considering absolute numbers, the range is four as a minimum, and 20 as the maximum value. Therefore, the higher the score, the better the self perception of his or her state of health.16 This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research with Medicines and Research Projects Commission of the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (PR(AG)608/2021).

Results

From January 1, 2021 to March 3, 2022, 118 patients were offered the use of NORA-app, of which 82 accepted to participate in the study (NORA) and 36 did not participate (control) because they were included in ongoing clinical trials (20 patients) or because they did not have a smartphone (16 patients). After a mean follow-up period of 6.04 months, 71 (86.6%) patients are still active users (27 through a caregiver); two patients have completed one year of follow-up at and nine are inactive, (three because of death and six because they are not accessible) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Flowchart of the study.

(0.12MB).

The baseline demographic and laboratory variables are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 73.4 ± 8 years, mostly male (75.4%), mean serum creatinine of 2.0 (1.6−2.4) mg/dL, with eGFR 30.4 ± 8.1 mL/min/1.73m2 (CKD-EPI), alb/creat was 971 (489−1,784) mg/g and glycosylated hemoglobin levels were 7.0 (6.3−8.0) %. The mean age of patients in the NORA-app group was 72.3 ± 8.2 years vs. 75.8 ± 7.1 years in the control group, being statistically significant (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of comorbidities or baseline analytical values, including serum creatinine (2.1 [1.6−2.4] vs. 1.9 [1.5−2.5]) mg/dL and alb/creat (962 [475−1,784] vs. 1,036 [560−2,183]) mg/g.

Table 1.

Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics.

Variables  All patients (n = 118)  Use of NORA-app (n = 71)  No use of the Control app (n = 36) 
Age, years  73.4 ± 8.0  72.3 ± 8.2  75.8 ± 7.1  0.016 
Male sex, %  75.4  79  66  0.143 
Active smoker,  12.7  9.7  19.4  0.146 
Arterial hypertension, %.  89.3  90.4  88.8  0.823 
Dyslipidemia, %.  55.9  57.3  52.7  0.647 
Obesity, %,  28.8  28.0  30.5  0.782 
Ischemic heart disease, %.  22.0  19.5  27.7  0.319 
History of CVA, %.  9.3  9.7  8.3  0.807 
Creatinine, mg/dL  2.0 (1.6−2.4)  2.1 (1.6−2.4)  1.9 (1.5−2.5)  0.817 
FGe*, mL/min/1.73 m2  30.4 ± 8.1  30.1 ± 7.9  31.0 ± 8.8  0.294 
Albuminuria, mg/g  971 (489−1.784)  962 (475−1.784)  1.036 (560−2.183)  0.562 
HbA1C, %, % HbA1C  7.0 (6.3−8.0)  7.0 (6.2−8.2)  7.1 (6.3−7.9)  0.734 
Total cholesterol, mg/dL  164 (137−200)  159 (131−196)  166 (143−204)  0.201 
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL  43 (37−54)  43 (37−54)  46 (39−54)  0.516 
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL  86 (63−111)  82 (62−106)  89 (72−113)  0.188 
Hemoglobin, g/dL  12.9 ± 2.0  12.9 ± 2.0  12.9 ± 2.1  0.587 
Ferritin, ng/mL  114 (56−230)  142 (55–261)  103 (56–211)  0.846 
IST,  29 (21−36)  30 (22−36)  27 (20−34)  0,933 
Calcium, mg/dL,  9.6 (9.2−9.9)  9.5 (9.2−9.9)  9.6 (9.3−9.9)  0.265 
Phosphorus, mg/dL  3.7 (3.3−4.1)  3.7 (3.3−4.1)  3.8 (3.3−4)  0.500 
PTH, pg/mL  180 (113−282)  186 (120−307)  155 (112−240)  0.925 
Calcidiol, ng/mL  16.0 (9.2−23.0)  15.1 (9.0−20.8)  17.2 (11.9−27.1)  0.067 
Sodium, mmol/L.  139.6 ± 2.7  139.4 ± 2.6  140.1 ± 2.7  0.094 
Potassium, mmol/L  4.7 ± 0.5  4.6 ± 0.5  4.7 ± 0.5  0.183 
*

CKD-EPI: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology collaboration; HbA1C: glycosylated hemoglobin A1C; TSI: transferrin saturation index; PTH: parathyroid hormone; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.

From the NORA-app group, 40 patients have reached 90 days of follow-up, while from the control group there were 21. Patients in the NORA-app group showed significantly lower alb/creat levels than controls (768 [411−1,971] mg/g vs. 2,039 [974−3,214]; p = 0.047). Serum creatinine was 2.3 (1.9–2.7) mg/dL in the NORA-app group vs. 2.1 (1.7–2.9) mg/dL in the control group, not statistically significant (p = 0.763). The eGFR was 26.4 ± 8.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD-EPI), in the NORA-app group vs. 28.7 ± 10.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD-EPI), in the control group, not being statistically significant (p = 0.169). Total cholesterol levels were 158 ± 41 mg/dL in the NORA-app group vs. 167 ± 34 mg/dL in the control group, not being statistically significant (p = 0.179) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Analytical variables at 90 days of follow-up.

Variables  App usage (n = 40)  No use of the app (n = 21) 
Creatinine, mg/dL  2.3 (1.9–2.7)  2.1 (1.7–2.9)  0.763 
eGFR (CKD-EPI mL/min/1.73 m)2  26.4 ± 8.5  28.7 ± 10.6  0.169 
Albuminuria. mg/g  768 (411–1.971)  2.039 (974–3.214)  0.047 
HbA1C, %, % HbA1C  6.9 (6.3–7.5)  7.3 (6.3–7.9)  0.309 
Total cholesterol, mg/dL  158 ± 41  167 ± 34  0,179 
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL  42 ± 10  44 ± 8  0,179 
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL  84 ± 34  82 ± 27  0,578 
Hemoglobin, g/dL  12.9 ± 2.2  13.0 ± 2.0  0.419 
Ferritin, ng/mL  214 (57–313)  173 (63–251)  0.747 
IST, %,  30 ± 11  25 ± 5  0.957 
Calcium, mg/dL,  9.6 (9.2–9.8)  9.7(9.3−.9)  0.220 
Phosphorus, mg/dL  3.7 (3.4–4.1)  3.7 (3.3−4-3)  0.424 
PTH, pg/mL  186 (119–286)  158 (120–244)  0.850 
Calcidiol, ng/mL  16.3 (10.7–26.)  16.3(9.7-–28.0)  0.348 
Sodium mmol/L,  139 ± 2.0  140 ± 1.9  0.428 
Potassium mmol/L  4.6 ± 0.6  4.6 ± 0.5  0.471 

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology collaboration; HbA1C, glycosylated hemoglobin A1C; PTH, parathyroid hormone; TSI, transferrin saturation index.

The optimal treatment compliance rate as measured by the Morisky-Green scale was 77% at baseline and 91% at 90 days (Fig. 2). Anxiety measured by the HAD scale was 35.7% (borderline 17.9%, altered 17.9%) at baseline and 32.43% at 90 days, while depression was 39.29% (borderline 17.86%, altered 21.43%) at baseline and 27.02% (borderline 13.51%, altered 13.51%) at 90 days (Fig. 3). According to the health status scale (PROMIS), altered mental health at baseline was 70.83% and 61.11% at 90 days, while altered physical health was 58.33% at baseline and 44.44% at 90 days (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2.

Adherence to treatment (Morisky-Green scale). Values expressed in percentages.

(0.05MB).
Fig. 3.

Evolution of anxiety and depression using the HAD scale. Values expressed in percentages.

(0.16MB).
Fig. 4.

Metal and physical health status scale (PROMIS). Values expressed in percentages.

(0.1MB).
Discussion

This is the first study performed on the use of NORA in patients with advanced kidney disease and diabetes. It shows that the use of a cell phone application that offers information on the management of cardiovascular risk factors provides more awareness and better control of the disease, since the rate of adherence to treatment improved from 77 to 91% in the first 90 days of follow-up. Similarly, in a different pathology such as stroke, Requena et al. demonstrated that the use of NORA-app improved patient awareness and compliance (86 vs. 69.2%, p < 0.01), together with better control of cardiovascular risk factors at 90 days of follow-up.12

To reach the maximum potential of the therapies currently available, it is necessary to ensure good compliance and awareness on the part of our patients so that they become actively involved in the management of their disease, a process currently known as health literacy.17–19 This therapeutic compliance is especially important in the case of cardiovascular diseases where recurrence rates are high.20 A digital platform that incentivizes compliance can offer added value to commonly used treatment guidelines.

It should be noted that, despite the advanced age of CKD patients, the use of mobile devices is becoming widespread among people in their sixth or seventh decade of life. It is currently not uncommon to see our patients with these devices and in the coming years it is going to be increasingly common. A systematic review conducted in 2019 showed that telemedicine was acceptably used by older adults,21 and if they perform adequate training they show significant improvements in their ability to perform tasks in their telemedicine unit.22 In our study, patients in the NORA-app group had a mean age of 72.3 ± 8.2 years, of which 44 have individual use of the app, while 27 is through caregiver, demonstrating easy management with the app thanks to the interaction between patient and healthcare professional.

It is classically known that alb/creat is a biomarker of renal disease progression,23 moreover it is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, so that a higher urinary albumin excretion rate is associated with a higher incidence of morbidity, cardiovascular mortality and progression of renal disease.24–26 and therefore its control is essential to delay the progression of renal disease. Currently, there are several pharmacological options aiming to control alb/creat.27–29 Moreover, the use of telemedicine could help in the management through modification to a healthier lifestyle of CKD patients. Katz et al. conducted a virtual follow-up program of CKD patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min/m2 and alb/creat > 30 mg/g and during one year, reporting an adequate follow-up of patients with safety and efficiency.30 In our study, in patients with diabetes and CKD, who used the NORA app presented significantly lower levels of alb/creat at follow-up as compared to the control group, being statistically significant, thus favoring the delay of disease progression, while other analytical variables such as total cholesterol and glycosylated hemoglobin showed a tendency to be lower than in the control group.

Regarding the evaluation of anxiety and depression, studies have shown that CKD patients have a high risk of presenting mental illness, being more frequent in patients on renal replacement therapy,31 in addition, it has been shown that the increased inflammation and oxidative stress that is present in patients with CKD leads to the development of depression.32 Studies have shown that digital mental health interventions can be effective in improving depression, anxiety and psychological well-being.33 In our pilot study patients in the NORA-app group showed a tendency to improve anxiety and depression during the first 90 days of follow-up. Narayanan et al. evaluated an integrated telemedicine platform to assess health status through scales (PROMIS-10) in oncology patients demonstrating feasibility and satisfaction of patients, presenting less burden of symptoms and a greater concern about lifestyle.34 In this regard our work demonstrated better mental and physical health status in the first 90 days of follow-up.

The use of telemedicine has increased during the last decade to facilitate the communication between health professionals and patients, providing remote medical care that aims to respond to the needs reported by the patient and promote a coordinated care between the different health services through remote monitoring.35,36 The ICTs appear to be very useful tools in a society that is increasingly accustomed to the use of new technologies and which make it possible to offer health services to people with geographical limitations or logistical difficulties to travel easily to the health center.11,37,38 Furthermore, during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was given priority to the implementation of telematic follow-up in patients with CKD in order to avoid hospital visits aiming of reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection. It is of interest to mention that terminal CKD has been identified as one of the first risk factors of mortality secondary to COVID-19.38–42

Our study is one of the few that has evaluated telemedicine in the progression of diabetic kidney disease, showing encouraging results for disease control and improving health literacy in the first 90 days of follow-up. Additionally, among the most important limitations of our study are the number of patients included, as well as the lack of information regarding sociocultural and economic level, since these are factors that could have influenced our results. In addition, since this was a pilot study, data such as blood pressure, weight, etc. was not available in the control group which would have allowed a more detailed comparison between the two groups. Randomized studies in this group of patients with diabetes mellitus and CKD could be very useful in the near future.

Conclusions

In patients with DKD who maintained the use of NORA-app in the first 90 days, it was shown to have high level of compliance with treatment, achieving better control of the disease. The generalized use of ICT can help in the personalized follow-up of these patients, with the objective of delaying the progression of renal disease, improving quality of life and reducing health care costs.

Funding

This work has been performed thanks to a grant awarded by the "Ayudas Fundación Senefro a la investigación en Nefrología", 2021 of the Sociedad Española de Nefrología (Spanish Society of Nephrology).

Conflicts of interest

M.J.S. reports speaking fees, consulting from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Esteve, Vifor, Bayer, Mundipharma, Ingelheim Lilly, Jansen, ICU Medical and Boehringer.

The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Patients with chronic kidney disease and their involvement with the new technologies available.

Appendix A
Supplementary data

The following is Supplementary data to this article:

References
[1]
H. Sun, P. Saeedi, S. Karuranga, M. Pinkepank, K. Ogurtsova, B.B. Duncan, et al.
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 183 (2022),
[2]
V.A. Luyckx, M. Tonelli, J.W. Stanifer.
The global burden of kidney disease and the sustainable development goals.
Bull World Health Organ, 96 (2018), pp. 414-422C
[3]
V. Jha, G.K. Modi.
Getting to know the enemy better-the global burden of chronic kidney disease.
Kidney Int, 94 (2018), pp. 462-464
[4]
N.R. Hill, S.T. Fatoba, J.L. Oke, J.A. Hirst, C.A. O’Callaghan, D.S. Lasserson, et al.
Global prevalence of chronic kidney disease - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
[5]
KDIGO 2020 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease.
Kidney Int, 98 (2020), pp. S1-S115
[6]
R.Z. Alicic, M.T. Rooney, K.R. Tuttle.
Diabetic kidney disease: challenges, progress, and possibilities.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 12 (2017), pp. 2032-2045
[7]
M.C. Pelle, M. Provenzano, M. Busutti, C.V. Porcu, I. Zaffina, L. Stanga, et al.
Up-date on diabetic nephropathy.
[8]
C.A. Purcell, A.S. Levey, GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration B, et al.
Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.
[9]
R.R. Wing, P. Bolin, F.L. Brancati, G.A. Bray, J.M. Clark, Look AHEAD Research Group, et al.
Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med, 369 (2013), pp. 145-154
[10]
P. Rossing.
Prediction, progression and prevention of diabetic nephropathy. The Minkowski Lecture 2005.
Diabetologia, 49 (2006), pp. 11-19
[11]
J. Tan, A. Mehrotra, G.N. Nadkarni, J.C. He, E. Langhoff, J. Post, et al.
Telenephrology: providing healthcare to remotely located patients with chronic kidney disease.
Am J Nephrol, 47 (2018), pp. 200-207
[12]
M. Requena, E. Montiel, M. Baladas, M. Muchada, S. Boned, R. López, et al.
Farmalarm: application for mobile devices improves risk factor control after stroke.
Stroke, 50 (2019), pp. 1819-1824
[13]
F.C. Prischl, P. Rossing, G. Bakris, G. Mayer, C. Wanner.
Major adverse renal events (MARE): a proposal to unify renal endpoints.
Nephrol Dial Transplant, 36 (2021), pp. 491-497
[14]
X.N. Solán, M.L. Sorli Redó, J.V. García.
Instrumentos de Medida de Adherencia al Tratamiento. Vol 24..
(2007),
[15]
P. Skapinakis.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, pp. 2930-2933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1315
[16]
Section Title 1 GUIDE Global Health PRO Measures CODE TECHNOLOGY; 2022.
[17]
K.L. Cavanaugh, C.Y. Osborn, F. Tentori, R.L. Rothman, T.A. Ikizler, K.A. Wallston.
Performance of a brief survey to assess health literacy in patients receiving hemodialysis.
Clin Kidney J, 8 (2015), pp. 462-468
[19]
L. Nielsen-Bohlman, A.M. Panzer, D.A. Kindig.
Health Literacy.
National Academies Press, (2004), http://dx.doi.org/10.17226/10883
[20]
K.J. Foreman, N. Marquez, A. Dolgert, K. Fukutaki, N. Fullman, M. McGaughey, et al.
Forecasting life expectancy, years of life lost, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 250 causes of death: reference and alternative scenarios for 2016–40 for 195 countries and territories.
Lancet, 392 (2018), pp. 2052-2090
[21]
J.A. Batsis, P.R. DiMilia, L.M. Seo, K.L. Fortuna, M.A. Kennedy, H.B. Blunt, et al.
Effectiveness of ambulatory telemedicine care in older adults: a systematic review.
J Am Geriatr Soc, 67 (2019), pp. 1737-1749
[22]
A.M. Lai, D.R. Kaufman, J. Starren, S. Shea.
Evaluation of a remote training approach for teaching seniors to use a telehealth system.
Int J Med Inform, 78 (2009), pp. 732-744
[23]
M.V. Rocco, J.S. Berns.
KDOQI clinical practice guideline for diabetes and CKD: 2012 update.
Am J Kidney Dis, 60 (2012), pp. 850-886
[24]
A.M.E. Spoelstra-De Man, C.B. Brouwer, C.D.A. Stehouwer, Y.M. Smulders.
Rapid progression of albumin excretion is an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.
[25]
G.C. Viberti, R.J. Jarrett, U. Mahmud, R.D. Hill, A. Argyropoulos, H. Keen.
Microalbuminuria as a predictor of clinical nephropathy in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Lancet, 319 (1982), pp. 1430-1432
[26]
C. García-Carro, A. Vergara, S. Bermejo, M.A. Azancot, A.I. Sánchez-Fructuoso, M.D. Sánchez de la Nieta, et al.
How to assess diabetic kidney disease progression? From albuminuria to GFR.
J Clin Med, 10 (2021), pp. 2505
[27]
C. Wanner, S.E. Inzucchi, J.M. Lachin, D. Fitchett, M. von Eynatten, M. Mattheus, et al.
Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med, 375 (2016), pp. 323-334
[28]
J.F.E. Mann, D.D. Ørsted, K. Brown-Frandsen, S.P. Marso, N.R. Poulter, S. Rasmussen, et al.
Liraglutide and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med, 377 (2017), pp. 839-848
[29]
T.A. Zelniker, S.D. Wiviott, I. Raz, K. Im, E.L. Goodrich, M.P. Bonaca, et al.
SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials.
[30]
I.J. Katz, S. Pirabhahar, P. Williamson, V. Raghunath, F. Brennan, A. O’Sullivan, et al.
iConnect CKD – virtual medical consulting: a web-based chronic kidney disease, hypertension and diabetes integrated care program.
Nephrology, 23 (2018), pp. 646-652
[31]
M.J. Lee, E. Lee, B. Park, I. Park.
Mental illness in patients with end-stage kidney disease in South Korea: a nationwide cohort study.
Kidney Res Clin Pract, 41 (2022), pp. 231-241
[32]
B.P. Oberg, E. McMenamin, F.L. Lucas, E. McMonagle, J. Morrow, T.A. Ikizler, et al.
Increased prevalence of oxidant stress and inflammation in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease.
Kidney Int, 65 (2004), pp. 1009-1016
[33]
E.G. Lattie, E.C. Adkins, N. Winquist, C. Stiles-Shields, Q.E. Wafford, A.K. Graham.
Digital mental health interventions for depression, anxiety and enhancement of psychological well-being among college students: systematic review.
J Med Internet Res, 21 (2019),
[34]
S. Narayanan, G. Lopez, C. Powers-James, B.M. Fellman, A. Chunduru, Y. Li, et al.
Integrative oncology consultations delivered via telehealth in 2020 and In-Person in 2019: paradigm shift during the COVID-19 world pandemic.
Integr Cancer Ther, 20 (2021),
[35]
J. Worswick, S. Carolyn Wayne, R. Bennett, M. Fiander, A. Mayhew, M.C. Weir, et al.
Improving Quality of Care for Persons with Diabetes: An Overview of Systematic Reviews-What Does the Evidence Tell Us?.
[36]
E.J. Gordon, J.C. Fink, M.J. Fischer.
Telenephrology: A novel approach to improve coordinated and collaborative care for chronic kidney disease.
Nephrol Dial Transplant, 28 (2013), pp. 972-981
[37]
J.M. Belcher.
The role of telenephrology in the management of CKD.
Kidney360, 1 (2020), pp. 1310-1315
[38]
Soler MJ. Nephrology in Europe in 2021- Modifying the Programs for Home-Based Dialysis and Telemedicine in Nephrology. ASN Kidney News. Published online January 2021:15-15. Accessed September 15, 2022. https://www.kidneynews.org/kidney-news/features/nephrology-in-europe-in-2021-modifying-the-programs-for-home-based-dialysis-and-telemedicine-in.
[39]
ERA-EDTA Council; ERACODA Working Group.
Chronic kidney disease is a key risk factor for severe COVID-19: a call to action by the ERA-EDTA.
Nephrol Dial Transplant, 36 (2021), pp. 87-94
[40]
M.J. Soler, M. Macia Heras, A. Ortiz, M.D. del Pino y Pino, M. Salgueira Lazo.
Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en los servicios de Nefrología españoles.
Nefrología, 40 (2020), pp. 579-584
[41]
J. Zúñiga, N. Toapanta, N. Ramos, S. Caparros, J. León-Román, M. Azancot, et al.
Infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica en hemodiálisis. Evolución de la PCR de SARS-CoV-2.
Nefrología, 41 (2021), pp. 476-478
[42]
C. Kruse, K. Heinemann.
Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of telemedicine during the first year of COVID-19: systematic review.
J Med Internet Res, 24 (2022),
Copyright © 2023. Sociedad Española de Nefrología
Idiomas
Nefrología (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
Supplemental materials
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?