Journal Information
Vol. 41. Issue. 2.March - April 2021
Pages 91-226
Vol. 41. Issue. 2.March - April 2021
Pages 91-226
Letter to the Editor
Open Access
Predictor factors of inappropriate rivaroxaban dosage using the Ckd-Epi equation
Factores de predicción de dosificación inadecuada de rivaroxabán utilizando la ecuación de CKD-EPI
Alejandro Isidoro Pérez Cabezaa,
Corresponding author
, José Luis Górrizb, Rafael Bravo Marquésa, Pedro Antonio Chinchurreta Capotea, Sergio López Tejeroa, José Antonio González Correac, Fidel Ernesto Mesa Pradoa, Almudena Valle Albercaa, Francisco Ruiz Mateasa
a Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella (Málaga), Spain
b Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, INCLIVA, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
c Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga-IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (1)
Tables (1)
Table 1. Clinical data corresponding to the sample (n=571).
Full Text
Dear Editor,

Rivaroxaban is approved for preventing stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), with one or more risk factors. It is recommended that the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation be used for the dosing of this drug.1 However, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is the method of choice for determining kidney function and is the equation used by the majority of laboratories in Spain.2 There are discrepancies in values calculated using the two equations which may cause errors in prescribed doses of rivaroxaban.3,4 Prescription of inappropriate doses is linked to an adverse cardiovascular prognosis.5 The objective of our study was to identify groups of patients in whom the CKD-EPI and CG equations can be used indiscriminately with a low risk of prescription error.

An observational, retrospective study was conducted of patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter seen at a cardiology clinic between November 2012 and December 2014. Patients with metal stent implantation or moderate to severe rheumatic mitral stenosis, for whom serum creatinine levels in the past 12 months were not available, or for whom body weight was not recorded at the clinic, were excluded.

A total of 571 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 69 years (±13.6 years), CHA2DS2VASc 2.8±1.7 and HAS-BLED 1.2±0.8. (CHA2DS2VASc is: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes mellitusStrokeVascular disease, Age, Sex.HAS-BLED is: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Bleeding, Labile INRs, Elderly, Drugs or alcohol.) Table 1 shows the patients’ baseline characteristics

Table 1.

Clinical data corresponding to the sample (n=571).

Male sex  302 (52.9) 
Age (years)  69±13.6 
Age ≥75 years  228 (39.9) 
CHA2DS2VASc (score)  2.8±1.7 
CHA2DS2VASc score
0–1  136 (23.8) 
≥2  435 (76.2) 
HAS-BLED (score)  1.2±0.8 
HAS-BLED score
0–2  537 (94) 
≥3  34 (6) 
Weight (kg)  79.3±16.1 
Body weight (kg)
≤60  75 (13.1) 
1–84  306 (53.6) 
≥85  190 (33.3) 
Type of atrial arrhythmia§
Atrial fibrillation  509 (89.2) 
Atrial flutter  75 (13.2) 
CKD-EPI (ml/min/1.73m2)  79.6±22.6 
>50ml/min/1.73 m2  508 (89) 
30–49ml/min/1.73 m2  48 (8.4) 
15–29ml/min/1.73 m2  12 (2.1) 
<15ml/min/1.73 m2  3 (0.5) 
CKD-EPI <70ml/min/1.73m2  176 (30.8) 
Cockcroft-Gault (ml/min)  90.1±40.5 
>50ml/min  483 (84.6) 
30–49ml/min  73 (12.8) 
15–29ml/min  11 (1.9) 
<15ml/min  4 (0.7) 
Hypertension  375 (65.7) 
Diabetes mellitus  138 (24.2) 
Stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and/or peripheral embolism  47 (8.3) 
Vascular disease  55 (9.6) 
Heart failure or LVEF <40%  59 (10.3) 
LVEF (%)  60.5±6.8 
Hypertensive heart disease  118 (20.7) 
Cardiomyopathy  26 (4.6) 
Severe left valvular heart disease  42 (7.4) 
Ischaemic heart disease  55 (9.6) 
Coronary revascularisation
PCI with stents  30 (5.2) 
Coronary surgery  15 (2.7) 
Lung disease  85 (14.9) 
Liver disease  17 (3) 

Qualitative variables are expressed in terms of n (%). Quantitative variables are expressed in terms of mean±standard deviation. PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention. LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction. (CHA2DS2VASc is: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes mellitusStrokeVascular disease, Age, Sex.HAS-BLED is: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Bleeding, Labile INRs, Elderly, Drugs or alcohol.)

§ A single patient may present atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

¶ Peripheral artery disease, myocardial infarction and/or atheromatous plaques in aorta.

Using the CKD-EPI equation, 41 patients (7.2%) would receive inappropriate dosing of rivaroxaban (nine due to underdosing and 32 due to overdosing). In particular, 509 (89.1%) would receive 20mg daily, 59 (10.3%) would receive 15mg daily and three (0.5%) would have a contraindicated prescription. Using the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CG), 487 individuals (85.3%) would receive a daily dose of 20mg, 80 (14.0%) would receive a daily dose of 15mg and four (0.7%) would have a contraindicated prescription.

In the univariate analysis, variables linked to a higher likelihood of receiving inappropriate dosing were the CHA2DS2-VASc scale (p<0.001), HAS-BLED ≥3 (17.6% versus 6.5%; p=0.028), creatinine (p<0.001); age (p<0.001), weight (p<0.001) and CKD-EPI (p<0.001). Among patients with dosing discrepancies, CKD-EPI values were 56.44±10.93ml/min/1.73m2 (p10=43.6; p90=68.9). In the multivariate analysis, significant predictive factors for receiving inappropriate dosing were extreme weight ≤60kg or ≥85kg (2.5 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–5.3; p=0.013), age ≥75 years (7.4 95% CI 2.7–20.4; p<0.001) and CKD-EPI <70ml/min/1.73m2 (23.1 95% CI 6.9–77.7; p<0.001).

A scale was constructed with these variables wherein one point was assigned to each value present (Fig. 1). A score ≥2 identified patients susceptible to receiving inappropriate dosing with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 70.2%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 20.6% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.92) (p<0.001). In these patients, estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) should be determined and, in the event that such discrepancy is confirmed, more specific testing should be done (24-h urine creatinine clearance) and the risk/benefit ratio individually assessed of selecting a high or low dose or a different direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with no dosing discrepancies depending on the formula used.6 In individuals with less than two criteria, the CKD-EPI and CG equations can be used indiscriminately. Hence, using this scale, calculation using the CG equation could be limited to 34.9% of patients.

Fig. 1.

Percentage of patients with inappropriate rivaroxaban dosage prescription based on the number of factors on the risk scale.


The sample size was small, especially in patients with stage 3–5 kidney disease, and this might have limited the statistical power. Larger studies will be needed to confirm the external validity of our results.


Alejandro Isidoro Pérez Cabeza and Francisco Ruiz Mateas declare that they have received consulting fees from Bayer Hispania, S.L.

J. Steffel, P. Verhamme, T.S. Potpara, P. Albaladejo, M. Antz, L. Desteghe, et al.
The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Eur Heart J, 39 (2018), pp. 1330-1393
[2] [accessed 05.04.19].
S. Manzano-Fernández, J.M. Andreu-Cayuelas, F. Marín, E. Orenes-Piñero, P. Gallego, M. Valdés, et al.
Comparison of estimated glomerular filtration rate equations for dosing new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Rev Esp Cardiol, 68 (2015), pp. 497-504
A.I. Pérez Cabeza, P.A. Chinchurreta Capote, J.A. González Correa, F. Ruiz Mateas, G. Rosas Cervantes, F. Rivas Ruiz, et al.
Discrepancies between the use of MDRD-4 IDMS and CKD-EPI equations, instead of the Cockcroft-Gault equation, in the determination of the dosage of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Med Clin (Barc), 150 (2018), pp. 85-91
X. Yao, N.D. Shah, L.R. Sangaralingham, B.J. Gersh, P.A. Noseworthy.
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 69 (2017), pp. 2779-2790
W.L. Eppenga, C. Kramers, H.J. Derijks, M. Wensing, J.F.M. Wetzels.
De Smet PAGM drug therapy management in patients with renal impairment: how to use creatinine-based formulas in clinical practice.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 72 (2016), pp. 1433-1439

Please cite this article as: Pérez Cabeza AI, Górriz JL, Bravo Marqués R, Chinchurreta Capote PA, López Tejero S, González Correa JA, et al. Factores de predicción de dosificación inadecuada de rivaroxabán utilizando la ecuación de CKD-EPI. Nefrologia. 2021;41:216–218.

Copyright © 2020. Sociedad Española de Nefrología
Nefrología (English Edition)
Article options
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?