Información de la revista
Visitas
316
Original article
Acceso a texto completo
Disponible online el 29 de mayo de 2025
Relationship between macrophage phenotype and kidney survival in patients with lupus nephritis
Relación entre el fenotipo de macrófagos y la supervivencia renal en pacientes con nefritis lúpica
Visitas
316
Ozcan Uzuna,
Autor para correspondencia
deu.ozcan@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Cihan Heybelib, Fatma Sema Anar Kutluc, Evrim Atmacad, Filiz Yıldırıme, Caner Cavdarb, Sulen Sariogluc
a Yalova Research and Training Hospital, Yalova, Turkey
b Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Izmir, Turkey
c Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Izmir, Turkey
d Mus State Hospital, Mus, Turkey
e Zonguldak Atatürk State Hospital, Zonguldak, Turkey
Este artículo ha recibido
Recibido 02 Agosto 2024. Aceptado 03 Abril 2025
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (3)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Tablas (5)
Table 1. General characteristics of the patients.
Tablas
Table 2. Associations between macrophage markers and progressive lupus nephritis.
Tablas
Table 3. Clinical and histological characteristics of patients with ≥2.7 CD163+ cells versus <2.7 CD163+ cells per high-power field in the kidney interstitium.
Tablas
Table 4. Associations between different clinical and histological characteristics and the numbers of glomerular and interstitial macrophages.
Tablas
Table 5. Histological characteristics of all cases.
Tablas
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Material adicional (2)
Abstract
Aims

To determine the possible relationship between macrophage phenotypes and the progression of kidney disease in patients with lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods

Using immunohistochemistry, CD68+ and CD163+ cells were counted per glomerulus and per high-power field in the tubulointerstitium. Progression was defined as a doubling of the serum creatinine level and/or progression to end-stage kidney disease.

Results

Among the 21 patients, 52% had class III or IV LN. During the median follow-up of 88 months, 5 (23.8%) patients experienced progression. In terms of clinical and pathological markers, the only significant difference between progressors and nonprogressors was the number of interstitial CD163+ cells (median 4 versus 2.4, respectively; p=0.025). A cutoff value of 2.7 for the mean number of CD163+ cells in the interstitium yielded a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 75% for progression. The estimated median time to progression among patients with ≥2.7 CD163+ cells was shorter (median 136 versus 202 months, p=0.023). A greater number of CD163+ cells in the kidney interstitium was associated with the progression of kidney disease (HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.22–6.80; p=0.016). Class III–IV LN was associated with a higher median number of glomerular CD163+ cells (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.1–3.49, p=0.023). Endocapillary hypercellularity and extracapillary proliferation were associated with greater number of CD163+ cells in the glomerular area. Among patients with class III-IV LN, the number of interstitial CD68+ cells was greater in those who experienced progression of kidney disease (p=0.012).

Conclusion

A greater number of CD163+ cells in the kidney interstitium was associated with the progression of kidney disease in patients with LN, while a greater number of CD68+ cells in the interstitium was associated with progression in the subgroup of patients with class III-IV LN.

Keywords:
Kidney, Chronic
Lupus erythematosus, Systemic
Macrophages
Abbreviations:
CKD
CKD-EPI
eGFR
ESKD
IFTA
IgA
IgG
IgM
LN
NIH
SLE
SLEDAI
Resumen
Objetivos

Determinar la posible relación entre los fenotipos de macrófagos y la progresión de la enfermedad renal en pacientes con nefritis lúpica (NL).

Métodos

Mediante inmunohistoquímica, se contaron células CD68+ y CD163+ por glomérulo y por campo de gran aumento en el tubulointersticio. La progresión se definió como una duplicación del nivel de creatinina sérica o progresión a enfermedad renal terminal.

Resultados

Entre los 21 pacientes, el 52% tenía NL de clase iii o iv. Durante la mediana de seguimiento de 88 meses, 5 (23,8%) pacientes experimentaron progresión. En términos de marcadores clínicos y patológicos, la única diferencia significativa entre los pacientes que progresaron y los que no progresaron fue el número de células intersticiales CD163+ (mediana de 4 frente a 2,4, respectivamente; p=0,025). Un valor de corte de 2,7 para el número medio de células CD163+ en el intersticio arrojó una sensibilidad del 80% y una especificidad del 75% para la progresión. El tiempo medio estimado hasta la progresión entre los pacientes con ≥2,7 células CD163+ fue más corto (mediana de 136 frente a 202 meses; p=0,023). Un mayor número de células CD163+ en el intersticio renal se asoció con la progresión de la enfermedad renal (HR 2,88; IC 95%: 1,22-6,80; p=0,016). La NL de clase iii-iv se asoció con un mayor número medio de células CD163+ glomerulares (OR 1,96; IC 95%: 1,1-3,49; p=0,023). L’ipercellularità endocapillare e la proliferazione extracapillare sono state associate a un maggior numero di cellule CD163+ nell’area glomerulare. Entre los pacientes con NL de clase iii-iv, el número de células CD68+ intersticiales fue mayor en aquellos que experimentaron progresión de la enfermedad renal (p=0,012).

Conclusión

Un mayor número de células CD163+ en el intersticio renal se asoció con la progresión de la enfermedad renal en pacientes con NL, mientras que un mayor número de células CD68+ en el intersticio se asoció con la progresión en el subgrupo de pacientes con NL de clase iii-iv.

Palabras clave:
Riñón
Crónico
Lupus eritematoso sistémico
Macrófagos
Texto completo
Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease, and half of patients suffer from kidney involvement.1 Lupus nephritis (LN) is known to be one of the most crucial conditions that determines patient outcomes2 and is the cause of initial presentation in many patients with SLE.3 The mortality associated with SLE is significantly greater in patients with LN than in those without LN. Due to insufficient control of SLE disease activity and the consequences of hemodynamic and metabolic overload of the remaining nephrons, 10–30% of patients with LN progress to kidney failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.1,4

The pathophysiology of SLE is complex, and both the innate and adaptive immune systems are involved. A multiple hit model has been proposed for the development of LN.4 Environmental and hormonal factors increase the risk of lupus nephritis development in the presence of genetic factors. This results in the development of anti-dsDNA antibodies and immune complex generation. Immune complexes deposit in the glomerular and tubulointerstitial areas, leading to kidney injury. Kidney injury occurs primarily due to the recruitment of monocytes and complement-dependent damage. In the initial proinflammatory environment, monocytes polarize toward proinflammatory macrophages (M1 phenotype). Regulatory macrophage polarization (M2) is induced through clear apoptotic cell remnants and immune complexes, and M2 macrophages play roles in anti-inflammatory and profibrotic pathways. Macrophage polarization toward these different phenotypes depends on microenvironmental triggers, including cytokines, chemokines, pathogens, and the predominant type of cell death.5 Polarization across these phenotypes is common during the course of different disorders,6,7 and these processes are reproduced in kidney injury and repair.8 Inadequate removal of apoptotic cell residues is involved in the pathogenesis of SLE, and this may lead to the abundant presence of profibrotic regulatory macrophages in the kidney, accelerating the progression of chronic kidney disease.4

The number of studies assessing the possible roles of macrophage phenotype and function in predicting the severity of LN and evaluating macrophages as therapeutic targets has been increasing.9–24 The levels of some macrophage markers may correlate with the clinical and histological severity of the disease. Using proteomics data, Louis Sam Titus et al. found that CD163+ macrophages were one of several dominant markers in the glomeruli of patients with LN compared to control patients, and this finding was similar in the tubulointerstitium.25 Urine-soluble CD163 is released from alternatively activated (M2) macrophages and is involved in the resolution of inflammation in glomeruli.15 Studies have shown that urine CD163 levels are correlated with more severe clinical findings,15 more severe glomerular inflammation13 and response to therapy.18 Although these studies confirmed the correlation between macrophage markers and disease activity scores and histological severity, whether these markers can be used as a means to predict kidney outcomes has largely not been studied. This study was performed to test this hypothesis.

MethodsPatient population

Patients who underwent kidney biopsy at our institution and had a diagnosis of LN between 2001 and 2020 were included. All the patients had a previous diagnosis of SLE prior to the kidney biopsy procedure. Medical records were obtained from medical files and the electronic system of the hospital. The date of renal biopsy was established as the baseline. The follow-up time was calculated from the interval between the biopsy date and the last clinic visit or end stage kidney disease (ESKD). In addition to the results for patients with LN, a comparison of macrophage counts was also made between patients with LN and a subgroup of patients with diabetic nephropathy alone.

The inclusion criteria were as follows:

  • Age18,

  • Diagnosis of LN on kidney biopsy,

  • The follow-up time was >6 months after the date of kidney biopsy.

Exclusion criteria were as follows:

  • Inadequate biopsy sample,

  • Unavailable clinical data,

  • Severe chronicity, including class VI LN,

  • Concurrent histological diagnosis.

Treatments and definitions

The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was expressed in mL/min/1.73m2 and calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula.26 Treatments were given based on the assessment of the attending physician and were not standardized. A permanent doubling in serum creatinine and/or progression to ESKD was defined as progression. At least partial remission was considered remission. This was defined as an achievement of a reduction in proteinuria of at least 50% to <3g/g measured as the protein/creatinine ratio (by 24h of urine collection) and stabilization or improvement in kidney function (±10–15% of baseline) within 6–12 months of starting therapy.27

Histopathological evaluation

Histopathological renal biopsy data were retrieved from previous pathology reports. Renal biopsy specimens were previously evaluated by direct immunofluorescence and light microscopy during routine examination of the biopsies. The minimum number of glomeruli required for light microscopy and immunofluorescence microscopy were set to 10 and 3, respectively. Tissue sections were examined by two independent pathologists. Specimens were evaluated with hematoxylin–eosin, Masson's trichrome, periodic acid–Schiff, and methenamine silver-stained sections by light microscopy and stained with antibodies against immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin M (IgM), complement 3c, C1q, kappa and lambda for immunofluorescence. The classification of LNs was based on consensus definitions.28 In the presence of a combination of class III and class V LN or class IV and class V LN, these combinations were classified as class III and class IV, respectively. Activity and chronicity were evaluated based on the modified National Institute of Health index.28

ImmunohistochemistryMacrophage markers

Kidney sections were stained with anti-CD68 (Cell Marque, CD68 [Kp-1] Mouse Monoclonal Antibody, Catalog no. CMC16829040) and anti-CD163 (Leica/Novocastra, CD163 [10D6] Monoclonal Antibody, Catalog no. PA0090) antibodies. All glomeruli were evaluated for the number of cells that stained positive with these antibodies. The mean number of positive cells per glomerulus was recorded. Positive cells in the glomerular, tubular, and interstitial compartments were counted. The results are expressed as cells/glomerulus and cells/high microscopic field. Time zero kidney allograft biopsy from living donors were used as negative controls. The number of CD163-positive and CD68-positive cells in the glomerular area was expressed as the number of positive cells per glomerulus. The number of these cells in the tubulointerstitial area was expressed as the number of positive cells per high power field. Five fields were analyzed and the mean cell number was calculated. Only the cortical compartment was evaluated since only a subgroup of patients had adequate medullary biopsy. Histopathological evaluation was performed by 2 independent pathologists, and an agreement was reached between them after discussion.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables are expressed as medians with ranges. Qualitative variables are expressed as proportions. The means of the groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Chi-squared tests were used for comparisons between proportions. Survival rates and survival times were tested using the log-rank test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the cutoff for the number of cells while defining particular macrophage phenotypes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of glomerular and interstitial CD68+ or CD163+ cell phenotypes. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine hazard ratios for associations between macrophage numbers and the progression of kidney disease. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL). A p value of 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Dokuz Eylül University (5482-GOA 2021/07-30) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference for Harmonization. All data extracted from the medical records were stored de-identified prior to the analysis. Informed consent was not obtained due to the retrospective study design.

Results

Of the 21 patients with LN, 19 (90%) were female, and the median age was 32 years (range, 19–74). The median SLEDAI (Systemic Lupus Erythematous Disease Activity Index) score was 16 (4–24). Thirteen (62%) patients were receiving glucocorticoids at the time of kidney biopsy, while fewer patients were treated with other options. Class III and IV lupus nephritis comprised 52% of patients. The clinical and histological characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

General characteristics of the patients.

Variables  All patients (N=21) 
Age  32 (19–74) 
Female (%)  90% 
Ethnicity (%Caucasian)  100% 
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)  0.84 (0.54–3.80) 
Estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73m2)  99 (11–135) 
Urinary protein excretion (grams/24h)  1.2 (0.1–9.0) 
SLEDAI  16 (4–24) 
Class of lupus nephritis (%)
9.5% 
II  33.3% 
III  9.5% 
IV  42.9% 
4.8% 
Treatments prior to kidney biopsy (%)
Glucocorticoids  62% 
Hydroxychloroquine  33% 
Azathioprine  10% 
Methotrexate  14% 
Cyclophosphamide  10% 
Rituximab  5% 
RAAS inhibitors  38% 

GFR: glomerular filtration rate; RAAS: Renin–Angiotensin Aldosterone System; SLEDAI: The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index.

During the median follow-up of 88 (6–190) months, 5 (23.8%) patients experienced progression of kidney disease. Of these 5 patients, 3 received hemodialysis within the first month following kidney biopsy and could not undergo dialysis during follow-up. Of the remaining 2 patients, one progressed to ESKD, and hemodialysis was initiated, while the other progressed to chronic kidney disease (CKD) but did not require renal replacement therapy. Table 2 shows the clinical and histological characteristics of patients who experienced progression and those who did not. The only significant difference between progressors and non-progressors was the number of interstitial CD163+ cells (median 4 versus 2.4, respectively, p=0.025, Fig. 1). The numbers of glomerular CD68+ and CD163+ cells and interstitial CD68+ cells were comparable between these groups.

Table 2.

Associations between macrophage markers and progressive lupus nephritis.

Variable  Progressive LN  Non-progression  p 
  (n=5)  (n=16)   
Clinical and demographics
Age  33 (23–61)  32 (19–74)  0.780 
Female  80%  94%  0.429 
SCr (mg/dL)  2.77 (0.54–3.80)  0.75 (0.55–1.40)  0.053 
eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2)  23 (11–134)  103 (48–135)  0.042 
Proteinuria (g/24h)  1.0 (0.3–3.3)  1.3 (0.1–9.0)  0.398 
Hypocomplementemia  80%  69%  0.550 
SLEDAI  12 (10–24)  16 (4–22)  0.660 
Histopathology
Lupus class III–IV  60%  50%  0.550 
C1q  40%  56%  0.450 
C3c  40%  75%  0.182 
IgG  60%  75%  0.450 
IgA  40%  63%  0.353 
IgM  80%  63%  0.443 
Activity score  7 (0–14)  6 (0–18)  1.00 
Endocapillary hypercellularity  2 (1–3)  0.5 (0.3.0)  0.660 
Neutrophils/karyorrhexis  0 (0.-3)  0 (0–3.0)  0.905 
Fibrinoid necrosis  2 (0–2)  0 (0–6)  0.780 
Hyaline deposits  1 (0–2)  0.5 (0–3)  1.00 
Cellular/fibrocellular crescents  2 (0–4)  1.5 (0–6)  0.495 
Interstitial Inflammation  0 (0–1)  1 (0–3)  0.109 
Chronicity score  6 (2–9)  3 (0–7)  0.130 
Total glomerulosclerosis score  1 (0–3)  1 (0–1.75)  0.660 
Fibrous crescents  0 (0–1)  0 (0–2  1.00 
Tubular atrophy  3 (1–3)  1 (0–2)  0.062 
Interstitial fibrosis  2 (1–3)  1 (0–2)  0.075 
Macrophage markers (median)
Glomerular CD68+cells  3.6 (1.9–12.8)  3.0 (0.1–19.3)  0.660 
Glomerular CD163+cells  1.6 (1.4–7.6)  1.9 (0.0–26.5)  0.398 
Interstitial CD68+cells  3.3 (1.3–3.8)  2.0 (0.0–6.6)  0.313 
Interstitial CD163+cells  4.0 (1.8–5.2)  2.4 (0.0–3.6)  0.025 

Quantitave variables are represented as median with the range (min–max). eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; IFTA: interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy; SCr: serum creatinine; SLEDAI: The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index.

Fig. 1.

Median number of macrophages among patients who experienced progression of kidney disease versus those who did not. The median number of CD68+ cells in the glomerular area was 3.6 versus 3.0 (p=0.660), the median number of CD163+ cells in the glomerular area was 1.6 versus 1.9 (p=0.398), the median number of CD68+ cells in the interstitial area was 3.3 versus 2.0 (p=0.313), and the median number of CD163+ cells in the interstitial area was 4 versus 2.4 among patients with progression versus without progression (p=0.025).

(0.08MB).

Fig. 2 shows the immunohistochemical evaluation of macrophage markers. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AUC=0.831) revealed that a cutoff value of 2.7 for the mean number of CD163+ cells per high-power field in the kidney interstitium yielded a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 75% for predicting the progression of kidney disease. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to this cutoff value. The estimated median time to progression of kidney disease among patients with ≥2.7 CD163+ cells in the kidney interstitium was 136 months compared to 202 months in those who had <2.7 CD163+ cells in the kidney interstitium (log rank, p=0.023). Table 3 shows the clinical and histological characteristics of the patient groups, which were classified based on the mean number of CD163+ cells per high-power field in the kidney interstitium.

Fig. 2.

CD68 (a and b), and CD163 (c and d) expression. Glomerular and interstitial regions are differentially involved, with images on the left showing less severe staining (IHC, original magnification ×40).

(1.03MB).
Table 3.

Clinical and histological characteristics of patients with ≥2.7 CD163+ cells versus <2.7 CD163+ cells per high-power field in the kidney interstitium.

Variable  ≥2.7 CD163+ cells (n=8)  <2.7 CD163+ cells (n=13)  p 
Clinical
Age  39 (19–61)  32 (19–74)  0.750 
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)  0.88 (0.54–3.80)  0.84 (0.57–2.77)  0.792 
eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2)  90 (11–135)  100 (23–131)  0.792 
Urinary protein excretion (g/day)  1.2 (0.3–4.5)  1.2 (0.1–9.0)  0.804 
Acute kidney injury  50%  31%  0.336 
Hypocomplementemia  75%  69%  0.590 
SLEDAI  12 (4–24)  16 (8–22)  0.345 
Histopathology
Lupus class III–IV  56%  50%  0.801 
Activity score  9 (0–15)  6 (0–18)  0.972 
Endocapillary hypercellularity  2 (0–3)  0.5 (0–3)  0.602 
Neutrophils/karyorrhexis  1 (0–3)  0 (0–3)  0.508 
Fibrinoid necrosis  0 (0–4)  0.5 (0–6)  0.862 
Hyaline deposits  1 (0–2)  0.5 (0–3)  0.917 
Cellular/fibrocellular crescents  2 (0–6)  1.5 (0–4)  0.554 
Interstitial Inflammation  1 (0–1)  1 (0–3)  0.345 
Chronicity score  3 (0–8)  3.5 (2–9)  0.382 
Total glomerulosclerosis score  0 (0–2)  1 (0–3)  0.193 
Fibrous crescents  0 (0–2)  0 (0–1)  0.808 
Tubular atrophy  1 (0–3)  1 (1–3)  0.464 
Interstitial fibrosis  1 (0–3)  1 (1–3)  0.382 
C1q  50%  54%  0.608 
C3c  50%  77%  0.213 
IgG  63%  75%  0.523 
IgA  50%  77%  0.410 
IgM  75%  62%  0.443 
Macrophage markers
Glomerular CD68+cells  3.0 (0.2–19.4)  3.5 (0.1–12.9)  0.972 
Glomerular CD163+cells  3.1 (0.0–7.6)  1.5 (0.0–26.5)  0.500 
Interstitial CD68+cells  3.0 (1.0–6.6)  2.0 (0.0–6.4)  0.238 
Interstitial CD163+cells  3.4 (2.8–5.2)  1.8 (0.0–2.6)  <0.001 

SLEDAI: The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Table 4 shows the associations between various clinical and histological characteristics and macrophage numbers according to the univariate regression model. Class III-IV LN and endocapillary hypercellularity was associated with a higher median number of glomerular CD163+ cells (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.1–3.49, p=0.023, OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.01–2.78, p=0.046). Extracapillary proliferation was associated with a greater number of glomerular CD163+ cells (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.04–3.24, p=0.036), while moderate to severe IFTA was associated with a lower number of glomerular CD163+ cells (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24–1.00, p=0.051). A greater number of CD163+ cells in the kidney interstitium was associated with the progression of kidney disease ((HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.22–6.80, p=0.016, 95% CI 1.22–6.80, p=0.016) and the absence of remission (OR 0.17, OR 0.03–0.92, p=0.040). There was no significant association between the number of glomerular or interstitial CD68+ cells and any of the clinical or histological characteristics. Table 5 shows histological characteristics of all cases. We could not demonstrate a significant association between activity and chronicity scores based on the modified NIH index and particular macrophage counts. Among patients with LN classes III and IV, the number of interstitial CD68+ cells was greater in those who experienced progression of kidney disease (p=0.012) Based on previous literature, we separately performed an analysis for the relationship between endocapillary hypercellularity and ≥7 CD68+ cells per glomerulus.10,29 Six of 7 (86%) patients who had ≥7 CD68+ cells per glomerulus had endocapillary hypercellularity, while 5 of 14 (36%) patients who had <7 CD68+ cells per glomerulus had endocapillary hypercellularity (p=0.031).

Table 4.

Associations between different clinical and histological characteristics and the numbers of glomerular and interstitial macrophages.

Variables (dichotomous)  GlomerularInterstitial
  CD68+ cell numberCD163+ cell numberCD68+ cell numberCD163+ cell number
  OR  95% CI  p  OR  95% CI  p  OR  95% CI  p  OR  95% CI  p 
Class III-IV lupus nephritis  1.40  0.99–1.97  0.054  1.96  1.1–3.49  0.023  0.81  0.51–1.30  0.384  1.09  0.57–2.06  0.803 
Hypocomplementemia  1.15  0.90–1.46  0.268  1.58  0.88–2.84  0.125  1.16  0.68–1.97  0.591  1.12  0.55–2.28  0.746 
Endocapillary hypercellularityCD163+ cell number  1.30  0.99–1.72  0.06  1.67  1.01–2.78  0.046  0.84  0.53–1.34  0.460  1.09  0.57–2.06  0.803 
Extracapillary proliferation  1.31  0.97–1.77  0.081  1.84  1.04–3.24  0.036  0.97  0.61–1.52  0.885  1.80  0.83–3.88  0.135 
Moderate-severe IFTA  0.64  0.37–1.11  0.115  0.49  0.24–1.00  0.051  1.32  0.81–2.17  0.265  0.56  0.26–1.23  0.150 
Acute kidney injury at presentation  0.98  0.83–1.15  0.792  0.97  0.82–1.16  0.762  0.66  0.37–1.20  0.172  1.62  0.76–3.42  0.210 
Remission  0.98  0.84–1.16  0.833  1.03  0.86–1.25  0.738  0.95  0.59–1.52  0.817  0.17  0.03–0.92  0.040 
Progression  0.99  0.82–1.19  0.905  0.99  0.81–1.20  0.889  1.11  0.66–1.87  0.684  2.88  1.22–6.8  0.016 

CI: confidence interval; IFTA: interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy; OR: odds ratio.

Table 5.

Histological characteristics of all cases.

Case  Lupus class  Activity scoreChronicity score
    Endocapillary hyper-cellularity  Neutrophils/karyorrhexis  Hyaline deposits  Fibrinoid necrosisa  Cellular/fibro-cellular crescentsa  Interstitial Inflammation  Total  Total glomerulo-sclerosis score  Fibrous crescents  Tubular atrophy  Interstitial fibrous  Total 
Case 1  17 
Case 2 
Case 3  11 
Case 4 
Case 5 
Case 6  13 
Case 7 
Case 8  11 
Case 9  15 
Case 10 
Case 11 
Case 12 
Case 13 
Case 14  13 
Case 15 
Case 16 
Case 17 
Case 18  14 
Case 19  10 
Case 20 
Case 21 
a

Scored with ×2 according to the modified NIH score.

LN patients were grouped according to the severity of the chronicity findings by histology. Patients with moderate to severe interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy had significantly lower glomerular CD68+ and CD163+ cell numbers than those with mild to no IFTA (Supplemental Table 1). Interstitial macrophage counts were comparable between the two groups.

A comparison was made between LN patients with nonsevere chronicity by histology and a subgroup of patients with only diabetic nephropathy with nonsevere chronicity (Supplemental Table 2). Patients with diabetes had significantly greater CD163+ cell counts in the tubulointerstitium, while patients with LN had significantly greater CD68+ and CD163+ cell counts in the glomerular area (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Median number of macrophages in patients with pure diabetic nephropathy versus lupus nephritis. Patients with diabetic nephropathy had greater CD163+ cells in the interstitium (6 versus 2.4, p<0.001), while patients with lupus nephritis had greater CD68+ (3.2 versus 1, p=0.002) and CD163+ (3.1 versus 0.5, p=0.016) cells in the glomerular area.

(0.06MB).
Discussion

Although crucial roles of macrophages in the pathogenesis and progression of LN have been recognized, macrophage phenotypes determined by histology and their relationship with the progression of kidney disease have not been studied. Previous studies have shown a significant association between urinary CD163+ levels and severe LN in terms of both clinical and histological characteristics.13,18,24,30 This study adds to the knowledge by demonstrating such a relationship between macrophage markers determined by immunohistochemical microscopic analysis of kidney specimens and the progression of CKD. Of the numerous histological findings, interstitial CD163+ cell number was the sole factor that had a significant association with the progression of kidney disease, with a hazard ratio of 2.8.

Renal macrophages may have proinflammatory, anti-inflammatory and profibrotic features leading to inflammation, fibrosis and loss of kidney function.31,32 Treatments that alter macrophage functions have been shown to hasten various types of organ damage due to SLE.12,14,29,33 Following examination of the expression profiles of numerous inflammatory molecules in the perfused kidneys of treated mice and untreated mice at different stages of disease, Schiffer et al. reported that activated kidney macrophages are markers of disease onset and remission in patients with lupus nephritis.22 The authors suggested that treatment options that prevent both the activation of monocytes and their migration to the kidney are needed.22 Another study showed that the depletion of macrophages before acute renal injury reduces damage and depletion during the recovery and repair phases; however, it diminishes tubular cell proliferation and delays repair.8 These observations confirm the multiple roles of macrophages both during the development and resolution of renal disease.

CD163 is expressed by type 2 macrophages, which work against renal inflammation, promote tubular epithelial healing, and preserve kidney function.32 M2 macrophages are the predominant type of macrophage in LNs.31 The presence of glomerular macrophages in the early stages and tubulointerstitial infiltration in later stages reflects the progressive nature of lupus nephritis.22 There is a significant relationship between renal function loss, tubulointerstitial damage, and M2 macrophages.20 Our current study revealed an increased risk of renal disease progression with iCD163+ macrophages in the LNs. If there is inadequate phagocytosis of apoptotic cell debris by M2 macrophages, this debris, including DNA and phospholipids, may persist in kidney tissue, leading to an excessive anti-inflammatory response to counterbalance inflammation and further tissue damage and loss of kidney function.4 On the other hand, although the anti-inflammatory properties of M2 macrophages are generally prominent, Bach1-mediated reductions in heme oxygenase-1 expression, which can be induced in vitro by stimulation with type 1 interferons, may play a role in increasing inflammation.34 The composition of the macrophage subtypes in LNs is thought to vary depending on the stage of the disease and the timing of disease development, but this has not yet been fully elucidated. An association between crescentic LN cases and CD163 has been demonstrated and was associated with the activity index.31

Patients with class III-IV LN represent a particularly greater risk group for progression and are characterized by mesangial hypercellularity and endothelial proliferation. Demonstration of a biomarker that predicts progression among patients in this high-risk group would be interesting. Among patients with class III-IV LNs, the number of interstitial CD68+ cells were significantly greater in progressors. The number of glomerular CD163+ cells was significantly higher in class III-IV LN. CD68+ cells are generally known as proinflammatory macrophages; thus, we speculate that a greater number of CD68+ cells may indicate more severe inflammation. A greater number of particular macrophage phenotypes may be a sign of a more severe histologic grade, which in part might explain the greater risk of progression in these patients. The study by Dias et al. included fifty newly diagnosed patients with proliferative lupus nephritis, all of whom received prednisone and six pulses of cyclophosphamide as induction therapy.11 Progressors showed a greater number of CD68+ cells in kidney tubules, particularly in the interstitium, and a greater chronicity index.

Our results showed that patients with pure diabetic nephropathy had greater numbers of macrophages in the tubulointerstitium, while patients with LN had greater numbers of macrophages in the glomerular region. This conclusion was reached after comparisons between patients with similar chronicity grades. This may reflect a more prominent involvement of the innate and adaptive immune systems, especially macrophages, in the pathogenesis of LN. One mechanism for the progression of kidney disease in glomerulonephritis is that it occurs via tubulointerstitial disease. This is known as the glomerular cytokine hypothesis and is explained by the recruitment of leukocytes (primarily macrophages), which release inflammatory mediators leading to tubular cell injury and the activation of interstitial fibroblasts.33 Our finding that interstitial but not glomerular CD163+ cell number is associated with progression may in part explain this hypothesis. On the other hand, patients with diabetes may be particularly vulnerable to insults that may damage the tubulointerstitial area, including ischemia, toxins, and infections.35

Due to the low number of patients, we could not perform multivariate regression analysis to determine whether the association between the number of interstitial CD163+ cells and kidney progression was independent of other factors, such as baseline kidney function and other histological findings. We do not have data on serial biopsy results, which would provide an opportunity to analyze associations between macrophage counts and activity and chronicity scores or between macrophage counts and responses to therapies in a longitudinal manner. Our method of cell count was semi-quantitative, while some previous studies used digital computational image softwares.10,11,20,29 Thus, the cell numbers in the present study may be underestimated. Indeed, median cell number in previous studies appear to be higher than the present study.(Dias Bos) The treatments used for patients were not standardized, and previous drug exposure may have affected macrophage polarization.36 Moreover, quantification of macrophage densities in native kidney biopsies was shown to contribute to risk stratification for progression to end-stage kidney disease irrespective of the primary kidney disorder37; thus, macrophage plasticity may not be specific to SLE. However, we observed differences in macrophage counts between diabetic nephropathy and lupus nephritis with similar chronicity. The strengths of our study include that it is the first paper to show a significant association between the number of CD163+ cells in the kidney interstitium determined by immunohistologic analysis and kidney disease progression. Our proposal to study this association among patients with stage III-IV LN is intriguing and would add much to the literature if our results could be confirmed.

Conclusion

A greater number of CD163+ cells in the kidney interstitium was associated with the progression of kidney disease in patients with LN, while a greater number of CD68+ cells in the interstitium was associated with progression in the subgroup of patients with class III–IV LN. Our results may contribute to ongoing studies evaluating macrophages as potential disease modulators and therapeutic targets during the course of LN.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not obtained due to the retrospective study design.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

The authors certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964, Declaration of Helsinki, and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data availability

Condensed anonymized data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Appendix B
Supplementary data

The followings are the supplementary data to this article:

References
[1]
S.V. Parikh, S. Almaani, S. Brodsky, B.H. Rovin.
Update on lupus nephritis: core curriculum 2020.
Am J Kidney Dis, 76 (2020), pp. 265-281
[2]
M. Lech, H.J. Anders.
The pathogenesis of lupus nephritis.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 24 (2013), pp. 1357-1366
[3]
H.J. Anders, R. Saxena, M.H. Zhao, I. Parodis, J.E. Salmon, C. Mohan.
Lupus nephritis.
Nat Rev Dis Primers, 6 (2020), pp. 7
[4]
L.E. Kwant, Y. Vegting, Tsang ASMWP, A.J. Kwakernaak, L. Vogt, A.E. Voskuyl, et al.
Macrophages in lupus nephritis: exploring a potential new therapeutic avenue.
Autoimmun Rev, 21 (2022), pp. 103211
[5]
H.J. Anders, M. Ryu.
Renal microenvironments and macrophage phenotypes determine progression or resolution of renal inflammation and fibrosis.
Kidney Int, 80 (2011), pp. 915-925
[6]
K.S. Eardley, C. Kubal, D. Zehnder, M. Quinkler, J. Lepenies, C.O. Savage, et al.
The role of capillary density, macrophage infiltration and interstitial scarring in the pathogenesis of human chronic kidney disease.
Kidney Int, 74 (2008), pp. 495-504
[7]
A.A. Eddy.
Experimental insights into the tubulointerstitial disease accompanying primary glomerular lesions.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 5 (1994), pp. 1273-1287
[8]
S. Lee, S. Huen, H. Nishio, S. Nishio, H.K. Lee, B.S. Choi, et al.
Distinct macrophage phenotypes contribute to kidney injury and repair.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 22 (2011), pp. 317-326
[9]
M. Allam, H. Fathy, D.A. Allah, M.A.E. Salem.
Lupus nephritis: correlation of immunohistochemical expression of C4d, CD163-positive M2c-like macrophages and Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells with disease activity and chronicity.
Lupus, 29 (2020), pp. 943-953
[10]
E.M.J. Bos, S.R. Sangle, S. Wilhelmus, R. Wolterbeek, N. Jordan, D. D’Cruz, et al.
Use of glomerular CD68+ cells as a surrogate marker for endocapillary hypercellularity in lupus nephritis.
Kidney Int Rep, 7 (2022), pp. 841-847
[11]
C.B. Dias, P. Malafronte, J. Lee, A. Resende, L. Jorge, C.C. Pinheiro, et al.
Role of renal expression of CD68 in the long-term prognosis of proliferative lupus nephritis.
J Nephrol, 30 (2017), pp. 87-94
[12]
R. Dou, X. Zhang, X. Xu, P. Wang, B. Yan.
Mesenchymal stem cell exosomal tsRNA-21109 alleviate systemic lupus erythematosus by inhibiting macrophage M1 polarization.
Mol Immunol, 139 (2021), pp. 106-114
[13]
N. Endo, N. Tsuboi, K. Furuhashi, Y. Shi, Q. Du, T. Abe, et al.
Urinary soluble CD163 level reflects glomerular inflammation in human lupus nephritis.
Nephrol Dial Transplant, 31 (2016), pp. 2023-2033
[14]
B. Horuluoglu, D. Bayik, N. Kayraklioglu, E. Goguet, M.J. Kaplan, D.M. Klinman.
PAM3 supports the generation of M2-like macrophages from lupus patient monocytes and improves disease outcome in murine lupus.
J Autoimmun, 99 (2019), pp. 24-32
[15]
Y.J. Huang, C.H. Lin, H.Y. Yang, S.F. Luo, C.F. Kuo.
Urine soluble CD163 is a promising biomarker for the diagnosis and evaluation of lupus nephritis.
Front Immunol, 13 (2022), pp. 935700
[16]
C. Jing, T. Castro-Dopico, N. Richoz, Z.K. Tuong, J.R. Ferdinand, L.S.C. Lok, et al.
Macrophage metabolic reprogramming presents a therapeutic target in lupus nephritis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 117 (2020), pp. 15160-15171
[17]
F. Li, Y. Yang, X. Zhu, L. Huang, J. Xu.
Macrophage polarization modulates development of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Cell Physiol Biochem, 37 (2015), pp. 1279-1288
[18]
J.M. Mejia-Vilet, X.L. Zhang, C. Cruz, M.L. Cano-Verduzco, J.P. Shapiro, H.N. Nagaraja, et al.
Urinary soluble CD163: a novel noninvasive biomarker of activity for lupus nephritis.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 31 (2020), pp. 1335-1347
[19]
A. Nomura, M. Mizuno, D. Noto, A. Aoyama, T. Kuga, G. Murayama, et al.
Different spatial and temporal roles of monocytes and monocyte-derived cells in the pathogenesis of an imiquimod induced lupus model.
Front Immunol, 13 (2022), pp. 764557
[20]
G. Olmes, M. Buttner-Herold, F. Ferrazzi, L. Distel, K. Amann, C. Daniel.
CD163+ M2c-like macrophages predominate in renal biopsies from patients with lupus nephritis.
Arthritis Res Ther, 18 (2016), pp. 90
[21]
N. Richoz, Z.K. Tuong, K.W. Loudon, E. Patino-Martinez, J.R. Ferdinand, A. Portet, et al.
Distinct pathogenic roles for resident and monocyte-derived macrophages in lupus nephritis.
JCI Insight, 7 (2022), pp. e159751
[22]
L. Schiffer, R. Bethunaickan, M. Ramanujam, W. Huang, M. Schiffer, H. Tao, et al.
Activated renal macrophages are markers of disease onset and disease remission in lupus nephritis.
J Immunol, 180 (2008), pp. 1938-1947
[23]
E.J. Yoo, K.H. Oh, H. Piao, H.J. Kang, G.W. Jeong, H. Park, et al.
Macrophage transcription factor TonEBP promotes systemic lupus erythematosus and kidney injury via damage-induced signaling pathways.
Kidney Int, 104 (2023), pp. 163-180
[24]
T. Zhang, H. Li, K. Vanarsa, G. Gidley, C.C. Mok, M. Petri, et al.
Association of urine sCD163 with proliferative lupus nephritis, fibrinoid necrosis, cellular crescents and intrarenal M2 macrophages.
Front Immunol, 11 (2020), pp. 671
[25]
A.S.C. Louis Sam Titus, Y. Tan, P. Tran, J. Lindblom, M. Ivbievbiokun, Y. Xu, et al.
Molecular architecture of proliferative lupus nephritis as elucidated using 50-plex imaging mass cytometry proteomics.
Clin Immunol, 254 (2023), pp. 109713
[26]
A.S. Levey, L.A. Stevens, C.H. Schmid, Y.L. Zhang, A.F. Castro 3rd, H.I. Feldman, et al.
A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.
Ann Intern Med, 150 (2009), pp. 604-612
[27]
B.H. Rovin, S.G. Adler, J. Barratt, F. Bridoux, K.A. Burdge, T.M. Chan, et al.
Executive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases.
Kidney Int, 100 (2021), pp. 753-779
[28]
I.M. Bajema, S. Wilhelmus, C.E. Alpers, J.A. Bruijn, R.B. Colvin, H.T. Cook, et al.
Revision of the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification for lupus nephritis: clarification of definitions, and modified National Institutes of Health activity and chronicity indices.
Kidney Int, 93 (2018), pp. 789-796
[29]
M.F. Soares, V. Genitsch, A. Chakera, A. Smith, C. MacEwen, S.S. Bellur, et al.
Relationship between renal CD68(+) infiltrates and the Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy.
Histopathology, 74 (2019), pp. 629-637
[30]
R. Gupta, A. Yadav, A. Aggarwal.
Urinary soluble CD163 is a good biomarker for renal disease activity in lupus nephritis.
Clin Rheumatol, 40 (2021), pp. 941-948
[31]
J. Li, Y.F. Yu, C.H. Liu, C.M. Wang.
Significance of M2 macrophages in glomerulonephritis with crescents.
Pathol Res Pract, 213 (2017), pp. 1215-1220
[32]
A. Shapouri-Moghaddam, S. Mohammadian, H. Vazini, M. Taghadosi, S.A. Esmaeili, F. Mardani, et al.
Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease.
J Cell Physiol, 233 (2018), pp. 6425-6440
[33]
R. Pichler, C. Giachelli, B. Young, C.E. Alpers, W.G. Couser, R.J. Johnson.
The pathogenesis of tubulointerstitial disease associated with glomerulonephritis: the glomerular cytokine theory.
Miner Electrolyte Metab, 21 (1995), pp. 317-327
[34]
D. Kishimoto, Y. Kirino, M. Tamura, M. Takeno, Y. Kunishita, K. Takase-Minegishi, et al.
Dysregulated heme oxygenase-1(low) M2-like macrophages augment lupus nephritis via Bach1 induced by type I interferons.
Arthritis Res Ther, 20 (2018), pp. 64
[35]
C. Heybeli, M.A. Oktan, H.U. Arda, S. Yildiz, M. Unlu, T. Demir, et al.
Predictors and histopathological characteristics of non-diabetic renal disorders in diabetes: a look from the tubulointerstitial point of view.
Intern Med J, 49 (2019), pp. 1524-1533
[36]
M.M. Ahamada, Y. Jia, X. Wu.
Macrophage polarization and plasticity in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Front Immunol, 12 (2021), pp. 734008
[37]
M.B. Pfenning, J. Schmitz, I. Scheffner, K. Schulte, A. Khalifa, H. Tezval, et al.
High macrophage densities in native kidney biopsies correlate with renal dysfunction and promote ESRD.
Kidney Int Rep, 8 (2023), pp. 341-356
Copyright © 2025. Sociedad Española de Nefrología
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Nefrología
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
Material suplementario
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?