Información de la revista
Acceso a texto completo
Pruebas previas, online el 23 de octubre de 2025
Tele-Nephrology in Practice: Economic Impact and Primary Care Perspectives
Visitas
37
Sofia Sousa1,
, Sofia Santos2, Beatriz Braga3, Ana Cunha3,5, Idalina Beirão3,4,5,6
1 Nephrology Department, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
2 Nephrology Department, Hospital das Forças Armadas Polo Porto, Porto, Portugal
3 Nephrology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
4 UMIB/ICBAS – Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine / Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Portugal
5 European Rare Kidney Reference Center (ERKNet) - Centro Hospitalar Universitário Santo António – ULSSA, Portugal
6 Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Portugal
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Abstract

Aims: Telemedicine used in nephrology has demonstrated non-inferiority to traditional care and acceptance by healthcare professionals and patients; however, cost effectiveness was less commonly reported. We aim to describe our centre’s experience with virtual consultations (VCs) and estimate cost reduction, as well as assess general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives.

Methods: Retrospective study of the patients referred for VC between January 2020 and December 2022 at Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António (ULSSA). We analysed patients’ demographics, including distance to hospital and autonomy, and estimated economic savings related to nephrologist’s time, patient transport and lost workdays. To assess GPs’ perspective, we administered a brief, closed-question survey to GPs to assess awareness, use, and satisfaction with VCs.

Results: A total of 456 patients were included, of which 260 (57%) were female and median age was 80 years old (IQR 72-87). Distance from the hospital varied between one and 540 km, with a median distance of 16 km (IQR 6-19). Estimated total savings were euro16697.89, equivalent to euro36.62 per patient per consult. The nephrologist time cost was estimated at euro966.11 for virtual consultations compared with euro3622.92 for initial face-to-face consultations, resulting in a time-related cost reduction of euro2656.81. Forty-seven GPs of a total of 236 GPs (20%) completed the survey; From the responders, 28% had used VCs and 77% reported satisfaction with the response. Prescription guidance was the most identified strength of VC. Lack of awareness was the main barrier to use.

Conclusions: In this single-centre experience, VCs reduced costs and travel burden while being acceptable to GPs. However, many GPs were unaware of this pathway, underscoring the need for promotion and integration in primary-care workflows. Future multicentre studies should evaluate clinical outcomes including avoidable face-to-face visits, hospitalizations, time to advice) and include patient and nephrologist perspective.

KEYWORDS:
Chronic kidney disease
virtual consultation
telenephrology
primary care
cost analysis
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Nefrología
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?